Skip to the main content

Review article

https://doi.org/10.46640/imr.9.17.1

The Rebellion and the inability to communicate Social Consciousness

Dario Terzić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-0407 ; College of Tourism and Management, Konjic, Bosnia and Herzegovina


Full text: croatian pdf 417 Kb

page 2621-2630

downloads: 590

cite


Abstract

Communication implies acceptance, rejection, understanding, disagreement, rebellion. We fight against arbitrariness. Even the first rebel, Prometheus, does not oppose all the gods, especially the nature and everything created. He opposes Zeus’s arbitrariness. „The rebellious man is“, says Albert Camus, „a man who says - no”. Rebellion can be metaphysical (Kain, De Sade), romantics, nihilists, surrealists, Striner, Nietzsche, historical (Spartacus, Bakunin, Marx, Lenin, Mussolini), artistic (Rimbaud, Van Gogh, Zolla, Mayakovsky, Brando). In the 1960s, the character of socially engaged rebels was emphasized. Kellner tells us about the “implosion of identity”, and in doing so implies situations in which identity is constructed using image and style. Hobbes, Locke, Habermas, Thorreau, Bey, Onfray, Passerin d’Entreves, Gibran and many others have contemplated and written about rebellion. The right of rebellion is not always understood as a general human right.

Keywords

communication; rebellion; resistance; disobedience; anarchism

Hrčak ID:

244034

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/244034

Publication date:

25.9.2020.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.802 *