Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc55/3/3
Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials’ Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study
Anna Theocharidou
; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Konstantinos Tzimas
; Postgraduate student, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Kosmas Tolidis
; Zavod za restaurativnu stomatologiju Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta Aristotel, Solun, Grčka
Dimitrios Tortopidis
; Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
Introduction: Hydrophilicity of dental impression materials is crucial for obtaining an accurate impression and necessary for the production of a well-fitting cast restoration. The most common technique for evaluation of hydrophilicity is a contact angle measurement. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the water contact angles of four groups of elastomeric impression materials, before and during setting. Material and methods: Flattened specimens (n=10) of tested impression materials were prepared by the use of a Teflon mold with specific dimensions. A 5μl droplet of deionized water fell on the specimen, and photos were taken using a Nikon D3200 DSLR camera and a 105 mm macro lens (Nikorr, Nikon) in specific time points. Results: The CAD/CAM material showed the highest contact angle measurements. The light body polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) material 1, polyether and vinylsiloxanether material showed comparable contact angle measurements especially at the initial time point. A statistically significant reduction of contact angles was reported during setup time for all PVS, PE and vinylsiloxanether materials, while the most expressed reduction of contact angle measurements, and thus the most significant increase of hydrophilicity were reported for light wash PVS material 2. Conclusions: The CAD/CAM impression material showed the most hydrophobic behavior. PVS materials showed excellent hydrophilicity. Polyether and polyvinyloxanether impression materials presented lower contact angle measurements, and thus superior hydrophilicity, compared with other tested materials initially and during setting. All tested impression materials presented a stepwise development of hydrophilicity during the setting stage.
Keywords
MeSH terms: Dental Impression Materials; Elastomers; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Author keywords: Contact Angle; Hydrophilicity; Elastomeric Impression Materials
Hrčak ID:
262376
URI
Publication date:
22.9.2021.
Visits: 980 *