Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.17.2.6
Causation and Causal Selection in the Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disease
Hane Htut Maung
orcid.org/0000-0003-0979-5180
; University of Manchester
Abstract
In The Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disease, Derek Bolton and Grant Gillett argue that a defensible updated version of the biopsychosocial model requires a metaphysically adequate account of disease causation that can accommodate biological, psychological, and social factors. This present paper offers a philosophical critique of their account of biopsychosocial causation. I argue that their account relies on claims about the normativity and the semantic content of biological information that are metaphysically contentious. Moreover, I suggest that these claims are unnecessary for a defence of biopsychosocial causation, as the roles of multiple and diverse factors in disease causation can be readily accommodated by a more widely accepted and less metaphysically contentious account of causation. I then raise the more general concern that they are misdiagnosing the problem with the traditional version of the biopsychosocial model. The challenge when developing an explanatorily valuable version of the biopsychosocial model, I argue, is not so much providing an adequate account of biopsychosocial causation, but providing an adequate account of causal selection. Finally, I consider how this problem may be solved to arrive at a more explanatorily valuable and clinically useful version of the biopsychosocial model.
Keywords
Derek Bolton; Grant Gillett; biopsychosocial model; causation; causal selection
Hrčak ID:
264568
URI
Publication date:
30.9.2021.
Visits: 1.889 *