Skip to the main content

Other

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2022.181

Early experience with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from an emerging implantation centre

Ivan Prepolec orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-202X
Miroslav Krpan
Vedran Pašara orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6587-2315
Borka Pezo Nikolić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-5238
Richard Matasić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-1704
Martina Lovrić-Benčić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8446-6120
Mislav Puljević orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-2581
Davor Puljević orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-2242
Davor Miličić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-9101-1570
Vedran Velagić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-5840


Full text: english pdf 138 Kb

page 181-181

downloads: 158

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; sudden cardiac death; ventricular arrhythmias

Hrčak ID:

287036

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/287036

Publication date:

8.12.2022.

Visits: 461 *



Introduction: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are a gold-standard therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). (1) Subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) provide a valuable alternative to conventional transvenous devices (TV-ICD) and can eliminate the risk of lead-related complications and lower risk of systemic infection in selected patients. Introduction of this technology involves higher economic burden and period of learning in emerging implantation centers.

Patients and Methods: We analyzed data regarding all S-ICDs implanted since the introduction of the procedure in our institution in December 2021.

Results: There were in total 7 patients (4 male and 3 female) with the median age 49 (28-64 years). All patients received S-ICD for primary prevention of SCD. Indications were as follows: ischemic cardiomyopathy (3 cases), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2 cases), non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (1 case) and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with concomitant cardiomyopathy (1 case). There were several different reasons for implantation of S-ICD rather than TV-ICD. Three patients suffered from severe kidney failure and two of them already had chronic dialysis catheters in situ. One patient had a previous infection of TV-ICD. Another patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and repaired tetralogy of Fallot was not suitable for TV-ICD due to occlusion of left subclavian vein and probable need for future percutaneous implantation of pulmonary valve. In one patient S-ICD was a preferred option due to young age. First 6 cases were implanted with support of an experienced proctor. In one case the defibrillation test was repeatedly unsuccessful, and the patient required multiple external defibrillations. Reposition of the device was scheduled with optimal final result. No other complications were observed periprocedural or during follow-up.

Conclusion: Subcutaneous ICDs have been safely and successfully implemented in our cardiology department without special surgical support. This experience will help to better address the need for prevention of SCD in special populations of patients. Although the total number of patients is still rather low, this could be improved by overcoming reimbursement issues.

LITERATURE

1 

Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, Winkel BG, Behr ER, Blom NA, et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022 October 21;43(40):3997–4126. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017572


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.