Skip to the main content

Other

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2022.270

Real-world data of prasugrel versus ticagrelor in acute myocardial infarction – experience from Dubrava University Hospital

Tomislav Šipić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-4523 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Jasmina Ćatić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-4201 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Jelena Kursar orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-4910 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivan Skorić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-2092 ; University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
Marin Viđak orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-9598 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Nikola Šerman orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-5537-3782 ; Zagreb Emergency Medicine Service, Zagreb, Croatia
Šime Manola orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-2674 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivana Jurin orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-9691 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: english pdf 145 Kb

page 270-270

downloads: 123

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

ticagrelor; prasugrel; acute myocaardial infarction

Hrčak ID:

287877

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/287877

Publication date:

8.12.2022.

Visits: 410 *



Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a cornerstone of the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. In Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 5 (ISAR-REACT 5) trial, prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor regarding the primary outcome, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, at 12 months. This superiority was primarily driven by a reduction in the number of MIs in the prasugrel group. Limited data are available concerning differences in clinical outcomes for real-life patients treated with ticagrelor versus prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One observational study indicated that prasugrel was safer and more effective than ticagrelor in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), with a reduction of reinfarction and major bleeding events at 12-month follow-up (1). Our objective was to determine and compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in a real-world population in our center.

Patients and Methods: This was an observational study conducted in Dubrava University Hospital. In total, 1380 patients (1176 ticagrelor, 204 prasugrel) who were hospitalized for acute MI from January 2017 to January 2020. There were 837 patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI) in ticagrelor group and 62 patients in prasugrel group. There were 329 patients with NSTEMI in ticagreolor group and 140 patients in prasugrel group. SYNTAX score was significantly higher in prasugrel group (13 vs 11). Median age of patients in prasugrel group was 64, and 62 in the ticagrelor group.

Results: After 12 months of follow up, 5.8% patients in the ticagrelor experienced major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (reinfarction, death, stroke or bleeding) vs 1.5% of patients in the prasugrel group irrespective of MI type (STEMI or NSTEMI) (p=0.003).

Conclusions: Comparison of these drugs suggested that prasugrel is safer and more efficacious than ticagrelor in combination with aspirin after both STEMI and NSTEMI. The nonrandomized design of the present research means further studies are required to support these findings.

LITERATURE

1 

Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Lahu S, Ndrepepa G, Menichelli M, Mayer K, et al. Ticagrelor or Prasugrel for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 October 1;6(10):1121–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2228 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190967


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.