Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.20.6.8

The 2022 Ranking List of Citation Analysis Researchers using h-Index

Gyula Mester ; Óbuda University, Doctoral School of Safety and Security Sciences Budapest, Hungary


Full text: english pdf 771 Kb

page 775-779

downloads: 223

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

The impact factor of scientific journals and the h-index depend on the citations. Therefore, the citation analysis is a very important part of scientometrics. The paper presents the 2022 ranking list of citation analysis researchers. The ranking is presented primarily according to the h-index of researchers. The advantage the h-index is that it combines both the quantity – number of articles and quality – citations to these articles. A researcher cannot have a high h-index without publishing a considerable number of articles. The h-index favors researchers that publish a continuous stream of articles. Researchers with the same h-index are ranked by the number of citations. The minimum h-index of the 10 ranked researchers is 26. h-index can be determined from the following online databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Publish or Perish program. The ranking is edited using the Google Scholar database.

Keywords

impact factor; h-index; number of citations; citation analysis researchers; Google Scholar

Hrčak ID:

289413

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/289413

Publication date:

30.12.2022.

Visits: 709 *




INTRODUCTION

The impact factor of scientific journals and the h-index depend on the citations. Therefore, the citation analysis is a very important part of scientometrics. The paper presents the 2022 ranking list of citation analysis researchers. The ranking is presented primarily according to the h-index of researchers. Researchers with the same h-index are ranked by the number of citations. The minimum h-index of the 10 ranked researchers is 26. h-index can be determined from the following online databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Publish or Perish program. The ranking is edited using the Google Scholar database. The h-index, as a particularly simple and useful way to characterize the scientific output of a researcher, was introduced by Jorge E. Hirsch in 20051, and it is defined as follows: “A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np papers have at least h citations each, and the other Np − h papers have no more than h citations each”. The h-index was applied to compare scientists, scientific journals, research teams, research institutions and countries. The advantage the h-index is that it combines both the quantity – number of articles and quality – citations to these articles2-6. A researcher cannot have a high h-index without publishing a considerable number of articles. The h-index favors researches that publish a continuous stream of articles. The article is organized as follows: in Section 1 the Introduction is given, in Section 2 the 2022 ranking list of citation analysis researchers is presented. Conclusions are given in Section 3.

THE 2022 RANKING LIST OF CITATION ANALYSIS RESEARCHERS USING h-INDEX

The 2022 ranking of citation analysis researchers is presented primarily according to the researchers’ h-index. The ranking has been constructed using the Google Scholar7-11 database. Researchers with matching h-index are ranked by the number of citations. Ten researchers are included in the ranked list. The minimum h-index of the ranked researchers is 26. Here is the 2022 ranking list: 1. Eugen Garfield h-index = 70 citations: 36 743

1. Eugen Garfield
indecs-20-775-g1.png
2. Gyula Mester h-index = 47 citations: 3 746
2. Gyula Mester
indecs-20-775-g2.png
3. Paul Wouters h-index = 42 citations: 9 959
3. Paul Wouters
indecs-20-775-g3.png
4. Howard D. White h-index = 35 citations: 9 664
4. Howard D. White
indecs-20-775-g4.png
5. Mohsen Nouri h-index = 33 citations: 3 671
5. Mohsen Nouri
indecs-20-775-g5.png
6. John S. Liu h-index = 29 citations: 3 984
6. John S. Liu
indecs-20-775-g6.png
7. Kailash Garg h-index = 29 citations: 2 315
7. Kailash Garg
indecs-20-775-g7.png
8. B.S. Kademani h-index = 29 citations: 2 288
8. B.S. Kademani
indecs-20-775-g8.png
9. Jasar Tonta h-index = 28 citations: 3 126
9. Jasar Tonta
indecs-20-775-g9.png
10. Andreas Thor h-index = 26 citations: 2 731
10. Andreas Thor
indecs-20-775-g10.png

CONCLUSIONS

In this article the 2022 ranking list of citation analysis researchers is presented. The ranking is presented primarily according to the h-index of researchers. Researchers with the same h index are ranked by the number of citations. The minimum h-index of the 10 ranked researchers is 26. The h-index can be determined from the following online databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Publish or Perish program. The ranking is edited using the Google Scholar database.

References

1 

Hirsch J.E.: An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572 2005.http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102

2 

Mester G.: Rankings Scientists, Journals and Countries Using h-index. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 14(1), 1-9 2016.http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.14.1.1

3 

Mester G.: Ranking of Croatian Researchers from Several Disciplines using Google Scholar Database. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 15(2), 168-173 2017.http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.15.2.6

4 

Mester G.: Ranking Baltic States Researchers. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 15(3), 174-179 2017.http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.15.3.1

5 

Mester G.: Massive Open Online Courses in Education of Robotics. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 14(2), 182-187 2016.http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.14.2.7

6 

Mester G.: New Trends in Scientometrics. Proceedings of the SIP 2015, 33rd International Conference Science in Practice, In: University of Applied Sciences, Schweinfurt, 2015.

7 

Kasac J.; Milic V.; Stepanic J.; Mester G.: A Computational Approach to Parameter Identificationof Spatially Distributed Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Initial Conditions. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Robotic Intelligence in Informationally Structured Space. IEEE, Orlando, pp.1-7 2014.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RIISS.2014.7009170

8 

Albini A.; Mester G.; Iantovics B.L.: Unified Aspect Search Algorithm. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 17(1-A), 20-25 2019.http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.17.1.4

9 

Berek L.: How can we Recognize Predatory Publishers? The Characteristics of Predatory Journals. Conference TREND 2020, paper No.T.4.2-2, 2020.

10 

Berek L.: How to Identify Predatory Journals? An idea of an Expert System. IPSI Transactions on Advanced Research, 16(2), 3-6 2020.

11 

Albini A.; Tokody D.; Rajnai Z.: Theoretical Study of Cloud Technologies. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 17(3-A), 511-519. 2019http://dx.doi.org/10.7906/indecs.17.3.11.


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.