Skip to the main content

Meeting abstract

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2023.72

Safety checklist implementation in invasive cardiology: a single center experience

Marina Budetić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1165-7097 ; University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivica Benko orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1878-0880 ; University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia
Mateja Lovrić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-6521 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Matko Filipović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-2108 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ružica Lovrić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-5025 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Nikolina Glogovšek orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-7769-5179 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Matija Vrbanić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-9436 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marija Grlić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-9659 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Biljana Šego orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0806-1233 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Zrinka Paić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-0691 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Biljana Hržić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5441-0900 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Goranka Oremović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7451-4341 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Senka Pejković orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-9358 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marina Žanić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5123-8586 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: english pdf 155 Kb

page 72-72

downloads: 184

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

invasive cardiology; safety checklist; implementation

Hrčak ID:

295950

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/295950

Publication date:

16.3.2023.

Visits: 560 *



Introduction: The avoidable risk of adverse events in invasive cardiac procedures remains too high. The causes are often multifactorial, reflecting the complex interaction between the operator, patient, team, and procedure. In the most developed centers, despite the use of modern protocols and equipment, 10 to 12% of patients are exposed to some kind of adverse event, of which more than half could have been prevented. Repeated analyses indicate that errors are rarely a failure of technical ability but occur due to the breakdown of teamwork and communication. (1,2)

Patients and Methods: By reviewing the existing Cath Lab checklists and available literature, we have produced a modified checklist for the main invasive procedures, primarily diagnostic angiography, coronary and heart/structural intervention, pacing, and invasive electrophysiology. This safety checklist consists of three parts: a) pre-procedural preparation that takes place at the ward; b) the periprocedural part, which takes place in the invasive laboratory, and c) the postprocedural part, which includes monitoring the patient after the invasive procedure again in the ward. After the initial training, the checklist was put into use in December 2022, and its implementation was systematically monitored for the next two months, until February 2023.

Results: During the 2-month period, 486 consecutive patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures were enrolled (age 69 (61-76); 324 males, 162 female). In the monitored group of patients, the following percentage of checklist fulfillment was recorded: a) pre-procedural 75.9% (43 mandatory variables); b) periprocedural 73.4% (28 variables), and c) postprocedural 79.2% (4 variables). The lowest fulfillment rate was noted when measuring respirations and saturation (27.0%) and the exact time of puncture site management (28.4%) in the invasive laboratory. 14 adverse events (2.9%) were monitored, of which 10 groin hematomas, and in 4 patients the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmia.

Conclusion: The obtained results clearly show the need for further education of the nursing staff involved in patient care. In the very process of implementation, more importantly, checklists modify team behavior, bringing a focus to patient safety and staff communication.

LITERATURE

1 

Fudickar A, Hörle K, Wiltfang J, Bein B. The effect of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist on complication rate and communication. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 October;109(42):695–701. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2012.0695 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23264813

2 

Lindsay AC, Bishop J, Harron K, Davies S, Haxby E. Use of a safe procedure checklist in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. BMJ Open Qual. 2018 July 13;7(3):e000074. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000074 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057949


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.