Skip to the main content

Review article

https://doi.org/10.46640/imr.12.23.3

A Contribution to Interpretation of Feuerbach’s Suspicious Absence

Darko Kovačić orcid id orcid.org/0009-0008-0943-6886 ; University of Zagreb, Faculty of Philosophy


Full text: croatian pdf 433 Kb

page 3815-3826

downloads: 133

cite


Abstract

Ricoeur’s conceptual framework of the “Masters of Suspicion” is rooted in the proposition that Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud advanced a profound reinterpretation of human consciousness, history, and culture by delving into concealed motives and latent meanings that often elude superficial observation. Each of them, in their unique manner, employed a methodology Ricoeur terms “hermeneutics of suspicion,” exposing foundational structures, desires, and conflicts that shape human experience in general and religious experience in particular. Their critiques of religion offered a deeper analysis, ultimately unveiling the intricate relation between societal structure (Marx), power dynamic (Nietzsche), and ideology (Freud). In this paper, we pose the question: Why does Ludwig Feuerbach, ostensibly one of the most committed practitioners of the hermeneutics of suspicion according to Ricoeur’s canon, not share this esteemed title with the others in Ricoeur’s ‘hall of fame’?

Keywords

Paul Ricoeur; hermeneutics; recolection; suspicion; Ludwig Feuerbach

Hrčak ID:

308276

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/308276

Publication date:

25.9.2023.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 515 *