Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended in preference to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib) (1). There is no direct comparison between DOACs and substantial share of patients are still treated with VKAs due to certain comorbidities or financial reasons. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established procedure to treat paroxysmal and persistent Afib but it increases thromboembolic risk (2). The aim of this study was to compare periinterventional platelet reactivity (PR) in Afib patients undergoing PVI on different chronic oral anticoagulation.
Patients and Methods: PR was analyzed with Multiplate function analyzer in 136 patients undergoing PVI procedures in our institution. Blood samples were drawn before the procedure and on the following morning. ASPItest, ADPtest and TRAPtest were used as assays for the quantitative in vitro determination of PR triggered by arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate and thrombin receptor activating peptide-6, respectively. Fourty three patients (31.6%) were taking VKA, while 38 (27.9%), 29 (21.3%) and 26 (19.1%) patients were treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Edoxaban was not available during the investigation.
Results: There was no significant difference in demographics between the groups. Patients on VKA had lower mean platelet volume (MPV) compared to patients on DOACs (9.9 vs 10.7-10.8 fL; p=0.020). Patients on xabans (rivaroxaban and apixaban) had lower baseline PR compared to VKA and dabigatran (Table 1). One day after PVI, there was no significant change from PR baseline in all four groups (Figure 1).
Conclusion: Our results show that there is no significant effect of PVI on PR one day after the procedure regardless of chronic oral anticoagulation that was used. Lower basal PR was noted in patients on xabans compared to direct thrombin inhibitor and VKA. This antiplatelet mechanism is not fully understood but might be associated with multiple direct and indirect pathways which could contribute to potential differences in events between patients on certain DOACs. This warrants further investigation in seeking optimal DOAC choice for each patient.
Acknowledgement: This study was part of SPARELIFE-CVD project funded by the Croatian Science Foundation.