Skip to the main content

Review article

The assessment of interpretation of test results in laboratory medicine

Gordon S. Challand
Ping Li


Full text: croatian pdf 170 Kb

page 146-153

downloads: 431

cite

Full text: english pdf 170 Kb

page 146-153

downloads: 412

cite


Abstract

There is a growing need for laboratory professionals to o'er advice on the interpretation of results, typically by adding a brief interpretative comment to a report. Surprisingly little evidence-base data exists to support interpretation of laboratory test results, and interpretative comments accompanying laboratory reports are complex, usually consisting of several components which may suggest possible diagnoses and additional investigations. Every comment is different, and assessment of interpretation is difficult. We report different approaches that can be used: assessing whole comments or comment components or key phrases; and using independent assessors or a pooled panel of experts. No approach can be considered to be a 'gold standard' since assessment is an imperfect science and is a guide to, not a definition of unequivocal solutions. Although External Quality Assurance Schemes examining interpretation provide information to individual participants on how their comments compare with others, their primary purpose is educational, and even more importantly, these Schemes enable us to gather knowledge on how to better establish and develop interpretation.

Keywords

interpretation of results; External Quality Assurance Schemes

Hrčak ID:

37599

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/37599

Publication date:

3.6.2009.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.739 *