Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

Antibacterial Effect of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Amalgam

Suzana Ferk ; Private Dental Practice, Zagreb, Croatia
Paris Simeon ; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Jurica Matijević orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-524X ; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Goranka Prpić-Mehičić ; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Ivica Anić ; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
Silvana JUKIĆ KRMEK orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2305-4082 ; Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: croatian pdf 193 Kb

page 8-13

downloads: 775

cite

Full text: english pdf 193 Kb

page 8-13

downloads: 656

cite


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of root-end filling materials, MTA and amalgam, by agar diffusion test. Materials and methods: Blood agar plates were inoculated with bacteria Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus mitis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis each, and a polymicrobial suspension consisting of all the tested bacteria. Material samples were divided among the inoculated plates, and after 48 hours of incubation, the diameters of the inhibition zone (IZ) were recorded. Results: The strongest antibacterial effect of MTA was against Streptococcus mutans (IZ = 7.6 mm, sd 1.0), followed by Streptococcus mitis and Lactobacillus acidophilus (IZ = 7.3 mm, sd 0.5). The inhibition zone (IZ) for Enterococcus faecalis was 5.6 mm (sd 0.7), and for the polymicrobial suspension 5.3 mm (sd 1.0). Staphylococcus aureus was the only bacteria MTA did not show any antibacterial effect against. Amalgam showed no antibacterial effect against any of the bacteria tested. Conclusion: MTA showed antibacterial effect against 4 of 5 tested bacteria and the polymicrobial suspension, while amalgam did not inhibit the growth of any of the bacteria tested.

Keywords

Root Canal Filling Materials; Bacteria, Anaerobic; Anti-bacterial Agents; Dental Amalgam; Streptococcus; Staphylococcus aureus; Enterococcus faecalis; Lactobacillus acidophilus

Hrčak ID:

65404

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/65404

Publication date:

15.3.2011.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.696 *