Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Sažetak sa skupa

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.448

The effect of SLGT2 inhibitors on serum electrolyte levels, kidney function and NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction

Marin Viđak orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-9598 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Petra Vitlov orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6983-1409 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Jasmina Ćatić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6582-4201 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ana Jordan orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-6259 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Andrej Novak orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-4870 ; University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, Zagreb, Croatia
Vanja Ivanović Mihajlović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6931-5404 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marin Pavlov orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-2774 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marta Puškadija orcid id orcid.org/0009-0004-1361-3911 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Nikola Pavlović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-7681 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivan Zeljković orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4550-4056 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Šime Manola orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-2674 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivana Jurin orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-9691 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 200 Kb

str. 448-449

preuzimanja: 127

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Ključne riječi

heart failure; sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; kidney function

Hrčak ID:

328002

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/328002

Datum izdavanja:

13.12.2024.

Posjeta: 346 *



Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have become the cornerstone of heart failure (HF) therapy across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum, with plethora of metabolic effects (1,2). Knowledge on effects of SGLT2i on electrolyte levels and kidney function in patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced HF (HFrEF) is still limited.

Patients and Methods: This was a registry-based study recruiting patients diagnosed with HF from May 2021 to February 2024 in Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia. We extracted data on age, gender, NTproBNP and electrolytes levels, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Patients with mildly reduced EF were grouped with patients with HFrEF.

Results: We have collected data from 1018 patients diagnosed with HF (median age 70 (95%CI 69-70.76) years, 33% female). HFpEF was diagnosed in 125 (12.3%), while HFrEF was diagnosed in 893 (87.7%) patients. There were 69 women (55.2%) in the HFpEF group and 267 women (29.9%) in the HFrEF group. Patients were younger in the HFrEF group (69 vs 73 years, p=.0004). HFpEF group had higher BMI when compared to HFrEF group (30.44 vs 28.67, p=.0074). Initial NTproBNP was higher in the HFrEF group (1615.5 vs 2667pg/L, p<.001). There were no differences in NTproBNP levels at 6 and 12 months between HFrEF and HFpEF groups (Table 1). There were no differences in eGFR or electrolytes serum levels at admission nor in the follow up (Table 2). NTproBNP levels decreased during the 6 and 12 months follow up, respectively (2264 vs 913.5pg/L, p<.0001 and 865 vs 681pg/L, p<.0001), while haematocrit levels increased (0.409 vs 0.424, p<.0001 and 0.4295 vs 0.431, p=.0001). The eGFR remained stable throughout the follow up period (66.45 vs 65.5mL/min/1.73m2, p=.0996 and 66 vs 65.5mL/min/1.73m2, p=.1453).

TABLE 1 Participants’ characteristics (N=1018).
HFpEF group (N=125)HFrEF group (N=893)P-value*
Age73 (72.0-74.94)69 (68-70)0.0004
Sex
Male56 (52.5%)626 (70.01%)
Female69 (47.5%)267 (29.9%)#
Body mass index (kg/m2)30.44 (28.92-31-37)28.67 (27.96-29.16)0.0074
NT-proBNP at admission (pg/L)1615.5 (1098.43-2020-84)2667 (2413.96-3083.03)<0.0001
NT-proBNP at 6 months (pg/L)712 (610.27-1085.1)938 (862.73-1001.57)0.0981
NT-proBNP at 12 months(pg/L)590 (420.94-939.67)689 (639.71-757.59)0.6358
eGFR at admission (45mL/min/1.73m2)65.09 (60.31-69.7)66 (63.89-67.85)0.4071
eGFR at 6 months (45mL/min/1.73m2)66.2 (49.96-73.85)65.4 (63-67.42)0.1707
eGFR at 12 months (45mL/min/1.73m2)63.1 (48.22-77.01)65.7 (61.23-68.8)0.2103
Potassium at admission (mmol/L)4.3 (4.2-4.4)4.3 (4.3-4.4)0.8729
Potassium at 6 months (mmol/L)4.3 (3.96-4.73)4.3 (4.3-4.4)0.6646
Potassium at 12 months (mmol/L)4.5 (4.2-4.61)4.4 (4.4-4.6)0.4323
Chloride at admission (mmol/L)103 (102-103)103 (102-103)0.8178
Chloride at 6 months (mmol/L)102 (101-103)103 (102-103)0.400
Chloride at 12 months (mmol/L)104 (103-104)103 (103-103)0.4078
Hematocrit at admission0.3975 (0.3907-0.4056)0.411 (0.407-0.415)0.1042
Hematocrit at 6 months0.4050 (0.3905-0.4239)0.426 (0.421-0.0431)0.0171
Hematocrit at 12 months0.4265 (0.4010-0.4430)0.4310 (0.4260-0.4377)0.3972
* Mann-Whitney test, # Chi square test, p<0.0001
HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate
TABLE 2 Comparison of NT-proBNP, hematocrit, kidney function and serum electrolyte levels in patients with heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction.
HFpEF group
C (95% Confidence interval)P-value*
NT-proBNP at admission vs 6 months (pg/L)1439.5 (989.023-2055.28) vs 741 (615.6-1100-58)0.0001
NT-proBNP at 6 months vs 12 months (pg/L)867 (603.32-1214.35) vs 599 (431.62-961.9)0.4595
eGFR at admission vs 6 months ((45mL/min/1.73m2)67.06 (56.6-74.32) vs 66.2 (49.96-73.85)0.0375
eGFR at 6 months vs 12 months (45mL/min/1.73m2)62.8 (44.83-75) vs 59.2 (57.8-77.01)0.4595
Hct at admission vs 6 months0.3925 (0.3832-0.4066) vs 0.4045 (0.3901-4230)0.2007
Hct at 6 months vs 12 months0.419 (0.383-0.4354) vs 0.4265 (0.4010-0.4467)0.0431
Potassium level at admission vs 6 months (mmol/L)4.15 (4.0-4.372) vs 4.3 (3.964-4.7361)0.2293
Potassium level at 6 months vs 12 months (mmol/L)4.1 (3.95-4.45) vs 4.15 (3.95-4.6)0.375
Chloride level at admission vs 6 months (mmol/L)103 (100-104) vs 102 (101-103)0.4320
Chloride level at 6 months vs 12 months (mmol/L)103 (101.02-104.97) vs 103 (102-104)0.1055
HFrEF group
C (95% Confidence interval)P-value*
NT-proBNP at admission vs 6 months (pg/L)2416 (2032.58-2687.03) vs 938 (863.33-1001-42)0.0001
NT-proBNP at 6 months vs 12 months (pg/L)865 (765.9-966) vs 685 (637.53-755.56)<0.0001
eGFR at admission vs 6 months ((45mL/min/1.73m2)66.34 (64.59-68.66) vs 65.4 (63-67.42)0.3025
eGFR at 6 months vs 12 months (45mL/min/1.73m2)66.1 (64.23-69.1) vs 65.6 (61.16-68.8)0.095
Hct at admission vs 6 months0.4110 (0.4070-0.4160) vs 4.260 (0.4210-0.4310)<0.0001
Hct at 6 months vs 12 months0.430 (0.422-0.433) vs 0.4310 (0.4259-0.4371)0.0005
Potassium level at admission vs 6 months (mmol/L)4.3 (4.2-4.3) vs 4.3 (4.3-4.4)0.0197
Potassium level at 6 months vs 12 months (mmol/L)4.3 (4.23-4.4) vs 4.4 (4.227-4.5)0.5033
Chloride level at admission vs 6 months (mmol/L)102 (99-104) vs 103 (100-104)0.0052
Chloride level at 6 months vs 12 months (mmol/L)103 (101-105) vs 103 (101-105)0.8231
* Wilcoxon paired sample test
HFrEF = heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF = heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, NT-proBNP = N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hct = hematocrit

Conclusions: There were no differences in electrolyte levels and kidney function between HFpEF and HFrEF groups, confirming that SLGT2 inhibitors provide similar efficacy across the spectrum of HF patients.

LITERATURE

1 

Authors/Task Force Members; McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al.. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 January;26(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3024 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38169072

2 

Nashawi M, Sheikh O, Battisha A, Ghali A, Chilton R. Neural tone and cardio-renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the literature with a focus on SGLT2 inhibitors. Heart Fail Rev. 2021 May;26(3):643–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-020-10046-w PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169337


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.