Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0024
Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System
Xavier Brioso
; Construction Management & Technology Reserarch Group (GETEC), Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Av. Universitaria 1801, Lima 32, Peru
Danny Murguia
; Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
Alonso Urbina
; Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
Abstract
This article presents strategies for teaching
scheduling methods such as takt-time, flowlines, and
point-to-point precedence relations (PTPPRs) using building
information modeling (BIM) models in the Last Planner
System. This article is the extended version of the article
entitled “Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline and Point-to-point
Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study,” which has
been published in Procedia Engineering (Vol. 196, 2017,
pages 666–673). A case study is conducted in final year
students of civil engineering at the Pontifical Catholic
University of Peru. The mock-up project is an educational
building that has high repetitive processes in the structural
works phase. First, traditional tools such as Excel
spreadsheets and 2D drawings were used to teach production
system design with takt-time, flowlines, and PTPPR.
Second, 3D and 4D models with Revit 2016 and Navisworks
2016 were used to integrate the previous schedules
with a BIM model and to identify its strengths and weaknesses.
Finally, Vico Office was used for the automation of
schedules and comparison of the methods in 4D and 5D.
This article describes the lectures, workshops, and simulations
employed, as well as the feedback from students
and researchers. The success of the teaching strategy is
reflected in the survey responses from students and the
final perceptions of the construction management tools
presented.
Keywords
Last Planner System; BIM; flowline; point-topoint precedence relations; takt-time; teaching
Hrčak ID:
198171
URI
Publication date:
30.1.2017.
Visits: 2.714 *