APA 6th Edition Zupančič, M., Colnerič, B. i Horvat, M. (2011). Subjective age over the adult lifespan. Suvremena psihologija, 14 (2), 150-151. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/83112
MLA 8th Edition Zupančič, Maja, et al. "Subjective age over the adult lifespan." Suvremena psihologija, vol. 14, br. 2, 2011, str. 150-151. https://hrcak.srce.hr/83112. Citirano 19.10.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition Zupančič, Maja, Blanka Colnerič i Martina Horvat. "Subjective age over the adult lifespan." Suvremena psihologija 14, br. 2 (2011): 150-151. https://hrcak.srce.hr/83112
Harvard Zupančič, M., Colnerič, B., i Horvat, M. (2011). 'Subjective age over the adult lifespan', Suvremena psihologija, 14(2), str. 150-151. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/83112 (Datum pristupa: 19.10.2019.)
Vancouver Zupančič M, Colnerič B, Horvat M. Subjective age over the adult lifespan. Suvremena psihologija [Internet]. 2011 [pristupljeno 19.10.2019.];14(2):150-151. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/83112
IEEE M. Zupančič, B. Colnerič i M. Horvat, "Subjective age over the adult lifespan", Suvremena psihologija, vol.14, br. 2, str. 150-151, 2011. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/83112. [Citirano: 19.10.2019.]
Sažetak Subjective age – defined as age felt – was measured in a sample of 782 respondents, aged between 18 and 89 years. Adults younger than 20 years had on average somewhat older subjective ages and those older than 20 reported younger subjective ages relative to their chronological age. The discrepancy between subjective age and actual age in years increased over adulthood. Differences for chronological age but not for gender and education were found in respondents reporting positive, negative and no subjective-actual age discrepancy. When the age discrepancy between subjective and actual age was considered as a proportion of chronological age, no increase was noted after the fourth decade of life; the respondents over 37 years felt about 15% younger than their actual age. Gender and education did not account for differences in the proportional age discrepancy with the full sample, whereas with the elderly subsample (N = 106) neither demographic variables (marital status, living arrangement and place of residence) nor five robust personality dimensions were linked to the discrepancy significantly. At the facet level, dominance and kindness were related to the proportional age discrepancy but a negligible portion of variance was explained.