APA 6th Edition Plant, R. (2012). Is John’s Gospel Ethically Defective?. Kairos, 6 (1), 7-21. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/215506
MLA 8th Edition Plant, Robin. "Is John’s Gospel Ethically Defective?." Kairos, vol. 6, br. 1, 2012, str. 7-21. https://hrcak.srce.hr/215506. Citirano 01.12.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Plant, Robin. "Is John’s Gospel Ethically Defective?." Kairos 6, br. 1 (2012): 7-21. https://hrcak.srce.hr/215506
Harvard Plant, R. (2012). 'Is John’s Gospel Ethically Defective?', Kairos, 6(1), str. 7-21. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/215506 (Datum pristupa: 01.12.2021.)
Vancouver Plant R. Is John’s Gospel Ethically Defective?. Kairos [Internet]. 2012 [pristupljeno 01.12.2021.];6(1):7-21. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/215506
IEEE R. Plant, "Is John’s Gospel Ethically Defective?", Kairos, vol.6, br. 1, str. 7-21, 2012. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/215506. [Citirano: 01.12.2021.]
Sažetak This paper discusses and evaluates the widespread view that John’s Gospel has little ethical value and may even be responsible for fostering antisemitism. It is argued that such criticisms are misplaced and that John is, in fact, advocating the kind of unity, mutual trust and self-sacrifice that would have been necessary among believers at a time of conflict between church and synagogue. Jesus’ willingness to wash the disciples’ feet, the egalitarian nature of the Gospel, and the paradigmatic community of Father, Son and Spirit, are identified as role models for the kind of love Jesus commands. Although John’s ethical focus is essentially inward-looking, it forms the basis for a distinctive Christian counter-culture and has important social and political implications. It is concluded that while John’s ethical vision is limited, and open to being misapplied, this can be avoided by interpreting it in the light of other biblical perspectives.