hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper

Authorisation to Settle Ex Officio the Prescribed Claim Secured by Pledge

Gabrijela Mihelčić ; Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci
Iva Tuhtan Grgić ; Pravni fakultet Svečilišta u Rijeci

Fulltext: croatian, pdf (395 KB) pages 187-204 downloads: 2.826* cite
APA 6th Edition
Mihelčić, G. & Tuhtan Grgić, I. (2012). OVLAST NA PRISILNO NAMIRENJE ZASTARJELE ZALOŽNOPRAVNE TRAŽBINE. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 33 (1), 187-204. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708
MLA 8th Edition
Mihelčić, Gabrijela and Iva Tuhtan Grgić. "OVLAST NA PRISILNO NAMIRENJE ZASTARJELE ZALOŽNOPRAVNE TRAŽBINE." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol. 33, no. 1, 2012, pp. 187-204. https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708. Accessed 15 Sep. 2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Mihelčić, Gabrijela and Iva Tuhtan Grgić. "OVLAST NA PRISILNO NAMIRENJE ZASTARJELE ZALOŽNOPRAVNE TRAŽBINE." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 33, no. 1 (2012): 187-204. https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708
Harvard
Mihelčić, G., and Tuhtan Grgić, I. (2012). 'OVLAST NA PRISILNO NAMIRENJE ZASTARJELE ZALOŽNOPRAVNE TRAŽBINE', Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 33(1), pp. 187-204. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708 (Accessed 15 September 2019)
Vancouver
Mihelčić G, Tuhtan Grgić I. OVLAST NA PRISILNO NAMIRENJE ZASTARJELE ZALOŽNOPRAVNE TRAŽBINE. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2019 September 15];33(1):187-204. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708
IEEE
G. Mihelčić and I. Tuhtan Grgić, "OVLAST NA PRISILNO NAMIRENJE ZASTARJELE ZALOŽNOPRAVNE TRAŽBINE", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol.33, no. 1, pp. 187-204, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708. [Accessed: 15 September 2019]

Abstracts
The authors analyse the permissibility of ex officio settlements of the prescribed claim according to the general rules on prescription contained within the Civil Obligations Act. They single out rules under the Article 222, 240 and 220 of the Civil Obligations Act and compare them with rules which govern this issue on comparative legal level. A comparison has also been made with respect to the rules from the Draft Common Frame of Reference of a European Private Law and Lando’s principles. Furthermore, the authors discuss the effects of dispositions by the parties on permissibility of ex officio settlements of the prescribed claim. Civil obligations rules which govern the material prescription are scrutinised in regards to rules on rights in rem regulating the assurance of claim by pledge. In their final remarks, the authors present conclusions and suggest solutions de lege ferenda.

Keywords
prescription; right of pledge; ex officio settlement

Hrčak ID: 87708

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/87708

[croatian] [german] [italian]

Visits: 3.228 *