hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Pregledni rad

New Facts and Evidence in the Process of Judicial Control of Arbitral Decisions

Vladimir Pavić ; Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (583 KB) str. 821-838 preuzimanja: 902* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Pavić, V. (2013). Nove činjenice i dokazi u postupku sudske kontrole arbitražne odluke. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 63 (3-4), 821-838. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731
MLA 8th Edition
Pavić, Vladimir. "Nove činjenice i dokazi u postupku sudske kontrole arbitražne odluke." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, vol. 63, br. 3-4, 2013, str. 821-838. https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731. Citirano 17.10.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Pavić, Vladimir. "Nove činjenice i dokazi u postupku sudske kontrole arbitražne odluke." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 63, br. 3-4 (2013): 821-838. https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731
Harvard
Pavić, V. (2013). 'Nove činjenice i dokazi u postupku sudske kontrole arbitražne odluke', Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 63(3-4), str. 821-838. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731 (Datum pristupa: 17.10.2019.)
Vancouver
Pavić V. Nove činjenice i dokazi u postupku sudske kontrole arbitražne odluke. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu [Internet]. 2013 [pristupljeno 17.10.2019.];63(3-4):821-838. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731
IEEE
V. Pavić, "Nove činjenice i dokazi u postupku sudske kontrole arbitražne odluke", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, vol.63, br. 3-4, str. 821-838, 2013. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731. [Citirano: 17.10.2019.]

Sažetak
Litigation strives toward efficiency by introducing inter alia restrictions on introducing new facts and evidence once the judgment has been rendered. Such new facts and evidence are impermissible, save in the presence of exceptional circumstances expressly provided in law. Arbitration proceedings are geared toward efficiency at least as much as litigation. However, legislation governing arbitration and international conventions seldom – if ever – contain rules on admissibility of new facts and evidence in the setting aside and recognition proceedings. This paper attempts to flesh out possible approaches to constraining of beneficium novorum in those proceedings. There is a number of conceivable solutions, such as analogous application of the rules applicable in the context of domestic legal remedies in civil proceedings (both ‘ordinary’ and ‘extraordinary’ remedies), alternative (sui generis) solutions, etc.

Ključne riječi
arbitration; new facts; new evidence; beneficium novorum; annulment; recognition; enforcement

Hrčak ID: 109731

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/109731

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 1.253 *