hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Original scientific paper

The Shepherd Borat?

Zoran Kurelić ; Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Fulltext: english, pdf (269 KB) pages 204-216 downloads: 322* cite
APA 6th Edition
Kurelić, Z. (2013). The Shepherd Borat?. Politička misao, 50 (5), 204-216. Retrieved from
MLA 8th Edition
Kurelić, Zoran. "The Shepherd Borat?." Politička misao, vol. 50, no. 5, 2013, pp. 204-216. Accessed 21 Feb. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Kurelić, Zoran. "The Shepherd Borat?." Politička misao 50, no. 5 (2013): 204-216.
Kurelić, Z. (2013). 'The Shepherd Borat?', Politička misao, 50(5), pp. 204-216. Available at: (Accessed 21 February 2020)
Kurelić Z. The Shepherd Borat?. Politička misao [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 February 21];50(5):204-216. Available from:
Z. Kurelić, "The Shepherd Borat?", Politička misao, vol.50, no. 5, pp. 204-216, 2013. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 21 February 2020]

Author argues that it would be a mistake to treat Slavoj Žižek’s political philosophy
as if it were a performance act. Žižek is a neo-Leninist writer, a political-
philosophical shepherd, but he is not the Shepherd Borat. Kurelić criticizes
and rejects Žižek’s reinterpretation of Benjamins’s ‘divine violence’
as theoretically incorrect and politically useless. By comparing Žižek’s and
Arendt’s understanding of the French Revolution Kurelić wants to show why
the ‘divine violence’ recommended by Žižek would for Arendt be an ‘element
of totalitarianism’. He points out that the political success of socialist
and communist ideas was always derived from the vision of the better future,
not from the promises of unrestrained revenge and political violence. Žižek’s
attempt to reconcile the terror of the Jacobins with his modern revolutionary
neo-Leninism is a political nonstarter.

Žižek; Arendt; Divine Violence; Terror; Totalitarianism

Hrčak ID: 115739


Visits: 597 *