APA 6th Edition Sesardić, N. (2007). Homoseksualni brak: pobjeda političke korektnosti i loših argumenata. Prolegomena, 6 (1), 5-28. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/12381
MLA 8th Edition Sesardić, Neven. "Homoseksualni brak: pobjeda političke korektnosti i loših argumenata." Prolegomena, vol. 6, no. 1, 2007, pp. 5-28. https://hrcak.srce.hr/12381. Accessed 20 Apr. 2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Sesardić, Neven. "Homoseksualni brak: pobjeda političke korektnosti i loših argumenata." Prolegomena 6, no. 1 (2007): 5-28. https://hrcak.srce.hr/12381
Harvard Sesardić, N. (2007). 'Homoseksualni brak: pobjeda političke korektnosti i loših argumenata', Prolegomena, 6(1), pp. 5-28. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/12381 (Accessed 20 April 2021)
Vancouver Sesardić N. Homoseksualni brak: pobjeda političke korektnosti i loših argumenata. Prolegomena [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 April 20];6(1):5-28. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/12381
IEEE N. Sesardić, "Homoseksualni brak: pobjeda političke korektnosti i loših argumenata", Prolegomena, vol.6, no. 1, pp. 5-28, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/12381. [Accessed: 20 April 2021]
Abstracts Many Western intellectuals, especially those in humanities and social
sciences, think that it can be easily shown that the persistent and massive opposition to same-sex marriage is rationally indefensible and that it is merely a result of prejudice or religious fanaticism. But a more detailed analysis of some of these widely accepted arguments against the conservative position reveals that these arguments are in fact based on logical fallacies and serious distortions of conservative criticisms of homosexual marriage. It is concluded that philosophers ought to resist the pressure of political correctness and that they should approach the debate with a more open mind than before.