APA 6th Edition Kalanj, R. (1993). SOCIOLOGIJA RAZVOJA I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ. Socijalna ekologija, 2 (3), 407-418. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/139068
MLA 8th Edition Kalanj, Rade. "SOCIOLOGIJA RAZVOJA I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 2, br. 3, 1993, str. 407-418. https://hrcak.srce.hr/139068. Citirano 04.07.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Kalanj, Rade. "SOCIOLOGIJA RAZVOJA I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ." Socijalna ekologija 2, br. 3 (1993): 407-418. https://hrcak.srce.hr/139068
Harvard Kalanj, R. (1993). 'SOCIOLOGIJA RAZVOJA I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ', Socijalna ekologija, 2(3), str. 407-418. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/139068 (Datum pristupa: 04.07.2020.)
Vancouver Kalanj R. SOCIOLOGIJA RAZVOJA I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 1993 [pristupljeno 04.07.2020.];2(3):407-418. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/139068
IEEE R. Kalanj, "SOCIOLOGIJA RAZVOJA I ODRŽIVI RAZVOJ", Socijalna ekologija, vol.2, br. 3, str. 407-418, 1993. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/139068. [Citirano: 04.07.2020.]
Sažetak The concept of sustainable development, created for the environmental topics purposes, is discussed in the context of sociology of development. The sociological discipline has formed two cycles: one covering the period from the beginning of the seventies and the other covering the seventies and the eighties. In the first cycle prevailing are economic, social, politic and anthropologic topics, while in the other there arises the environment dimension of the development. In the first cycle the development is seen as sharp dichotomy, e.g between the North/South, developed/underdeveloped, while in the other one the question is considered on a more global level, the important place being given to the relationship with nature, and the topic of development has been taking on the characteristics of consensus. The relation between the sociology of development and the concept of sustainable development is a double one: the sociology is accepting it as a rational model of harmonising their developmental interests, but, at the same time, it gives warning of the fact that behind the model there are hidden un-surmounted, even worsened, differences between the developed and underdeveloped parts of the world, between the techno-economical rationality and environmental dimensioning of the development.