hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609

Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge

Davor Barić   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-5955-0275 ; Department of Cardiac Surgery andTransplantation, Dubrava UniversityHospital, Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (200 KB) str. 609-620 preuzimanja: 826* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Barić, D. (2014). Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge. Croatian Medical Journal, 55 (6), 609-620. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609
MLA 8th Edition
Barić, Davor. "Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge." Croatian Medical Journal, vol. 55, br. 6, 2014, str. 609-620. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609. Citirano 20.10.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Barić, Davor. "Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge." Croatian Medical Journal 55, br. 6 (2014): 609-620. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609
Harvard
Barić, D. (2014). 'Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge', Croatian Medical Journal, 55(6), str. 609-620. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609
Vancouver
Barić D. Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge. Croat Med J. [Internet]. 2014 [pristupljeno 20.10.2021.];55(6):609-620. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609
IEEE
D. Barić, "Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge", Croatian Medical Journal, vol.55, br. 6, str. 609-620, 2014. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.609

Sažetak
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have
become standard therapy option for patients with advanced
heart failure. They offer several advantages over
previously used pulsatile-flow LVADs, including improved
durability, less surgical trauma, higher energy efficiency,
and lower thrombogenicity. These benefits translate into
better survival, lower frequency of adverse events, improved
quality of life, and higher functional capacity of
patients. However, mounting evidence shows unanticipated
consequences of continuous-flow support, such as
acquired aortic valve insufficiency and acquired von Willebrand
syndrome. In this review article we discuss current
evidence on differences between continuous and pulsatile
mechanical circulatory support, with a focus on clinical implications
and potential benefits of pulsatile flow.

Hrčak ID: 139289

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/139289

Posjeta: 991 *