APA 6th Edition Kufrin, K. (1996). EKOLOŠKI STAVOVI I SPREMNOST ZA EKOLOŠKI ANGAŽMAN. Socijalna ekologija, 5 (1), 1-20. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/141414
MLA 8th Edition Kufrin, Krešimir. "EKOLOŠKI STAVOVI I SPREMNOST ZA EKOLOŠKI ANGAŽMAN." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 5, br. 1, 1996, str. 1-20. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141414. Citirano 15.07.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Kufrin, Krešimir. "EKOLOŠKI STAVOVI I SPREMNOST ZA EKOLOŠKI ANGAŽMAN." Socijalna ekologija 5, br. 1 (1996): 1-20. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141414
Harvard Kufrin, K. (1996). 'EKOLOŠKI STAVOVI I SPREMNOST ZA EKOLOŠKI ANGAŽMAN', Socijalna ekologija, 5(1), str. 1-20. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141414 (Datum pristupa: 15.07.2020.)
Vancouver Kufrin K. EKOLOŠKI STAVOVI I SPREMNOST ZA EKOLOŠKI ANGAŽMAN. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 1996 [pristupljeno 15.07.2020.];5(1):1-20. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141414
IEEE K. Kufrin, "EKOLOŠKI STAVOVI I SPREMNOST ZA EKOLOŠKI ANGAŽMAN", Socijalna ekologija, vol.5, br. 1, str. 1-20, 1996. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141414. [Citirano: 15.07.2020.]
Sažetak Using the results of a research conducted in 1992 on a student sample (N=547; Zagreb and Rijeka Universities), the author analyses: (1) the relationship between general environmental attitudes (humans–nature) and more specific attitudes towards some »classical« environmental issues (nuclear energy, pollution, natural resources, population problems, food contamination, environmental protection), and (2) the relationship between both types of attitudes and readiness for proenvironmental behavior.
Factor analysis of general environmental attitudes has extracted 3 expected dimensions: anthropocentrism, naturalism and technicism. On the side of attitudes towards specific environmental issues, 6 purely correlated factors have been extracted, each factor corresponding to one of the six issues.
Such results of factor analysis, as well as weak correlations between general and specific attitudes, indicate pronounced segmentation of »environmental awareness«. Although specific attitudes are somewhat better predictor (r2 = .122) of the readiness for proenvironmental behavior than general attitudes (r2<+>=<+>.055), both types of attitudes purely explain the variance of the measure of the readiness for proenvironmental behavior.