APA 6th Edition Cifrić, I. (1996). TRANZICIJA I TRANSFORMACIJA — IZMEĐU NORME I PRAKSE. Socijalna ekologija, 5 (2), 135-153. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/141435
MLA 8th Edition Cifrić, Ivan. "TRANZICIJA I TRANSFORMACIJA — IZMEĐU NORME I PRAKSE." Socijalna ekologija, vol. 5, br. 2, 1996, str. 135-153. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141435. Citirano 11.12.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition Cifrić, Ivan. "TRANZICIJA I TRANSFORMACIJA — IZMEĐU NORME I PRAKSE." Socijalna ekologija 5, br. 2 (1996): 135-153. https://hrcak.srce.hr/141435
Harvard Cifrić, I. (1996). 'TRANZICIJA I TRANSFORMACIJA — IZMEĐU NORME I PRAKSE', Socijalna ekologija, 5(2), str. 135-153. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141435 (Datum pristupa: 11.12.2019.)
Vancouver Cifrić I. TRANZICIJA I TRANSFORMACIJA — IZMEĐU NORME I PRAKSE. Socijalna ekologija [Internet]. 1996 [pristupljeno 11.12.2019.];5(2):135-153. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141435
IEEE I. Cifrić, "TRANZICIJA I TRANSFORMACIJA — IZMEĐU NORME I PRAKSE", Socijalna ekologija, vol.5, br. 2, str. 135-153, 1996. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/141435. [Citirano: 11.12.2019.]
Sažetak In spite of numerous critics of socialism, until the fall of the Berlin wall there were no precise prognoses on the fall of socialism and shaping of past–communist societies.
Transition, as a passing over form socialist into modern industrial society, has some features common to all societies in transition, but there are some differences as well. A common feature is the rejection of totalitarianism and utopia of revolution in the realization of a model of society. The process of transformation of individual societies shows the differences that depend on the distinctions in democratic experience, inherited structures and world–wide politics.
Transition and transformation indicate also radical changes from "collective–egalitarian" to "individual–liberal" model of values. Two images of society mix in the symbolic structure of societies in transition: traditional and modern identity.
Empirical research of the desirability of the three models (market–oriented, state–oriented, and market–oriented with the social elements) shows differentiated views on the role of the state and market in particular fields. Generally, the market–oriented model with social elements is the most desirable.
Transition and transformation have a historical significance, and are challenge for reconsideration of democracy in western societies as well.