hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity

Dino Galetti ; Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park (Kingsway Campus), South Africa

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (166 KB) str. 5-29 preuzimanja: 355* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Galetti, D. (2015). On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity. Prolegomena, 14 (1), 5-29. Preuzeto s
MLA 8th Edition
Galetti, Dino. "On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity." Prolegomena, vol. 14, br. 1, 2015, str. 5-29. Citirano 05.12.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Galetti, Dino. "On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity." Prolegomena 14, br. 1 (2015): 5-29.
Galetti, D. (2015). 'On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity', Prolegomena, 14(1), str. 5-29. Preuzeto s: (Datum pristupa: 05.12.2019.)
Galetti D. On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity. Prolegomena [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 05.12.2019.];14(1):5-29. Dostupno na:
D. Galetti, "On Husserl’s Early Logic of Intersubjectivity", Prolegomena, vol.14, br. 1, str. 5-29, 2015. [Online]. Dostupno na: [Citirano: 05.12.2019.]

Our article seeks to demonstrate that Husserl’s approach to intersubjectivity in his First Investigation of 1901/1913 was rigorous rather than rash. To do so, it applies a combination of intentionality and whole-part logic that has been overlooked in Husserl study. It therefore starts from Husserl’s Prolegomena of 1901 to follow his normative phenomenology until it excludes knowledge of another’s consciousness, then unpacks how he does so by his “proofs” in his 1913 Third Investigation (also considering his 1901 version), to apply those results to his First Investigation. The outcomes might demonstrate an unexpected rigour in Husserl’s early address to intersubjectivity, and even support a novel logic that considers alterity.

Ključne riječi
Alterity; First Investigation; Husserl; intersubjectivity; Prolegomena; Third Investigation; whole-part

Hrčak ID: 141859


Posjeta: 535 *