hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Pregledni rad
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6

Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija

Darije Plančak ; Zavod za parodontologiju Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Larisa Musić ; Polivalentna stomatološka ordinacija Dom zdravlja Čakovec, Čakovec, Hrvatska
Ivan Puhar ; Zavod za parodontologiju Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (258 KB) str. 234-241 preuzimanja: 195* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Plančak, D., Musić, L. i Puhar, I. (2015). Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49 (3), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
MLA 8th Edition
Plančak, Darije, et al. "Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 49, br. 3, 2015, str. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6. Citirano 27.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Plančak, Darije, Larisa Musić i Ivan Puhar. "Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija." Acta stomatologica Croatica 49, br. 3 (2015): 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
Harvard
Plančak, D., Musić, L., i Puhar, I. (2015). 'Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49(3), str. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
Vancouver
Plančak D, Musić L, Puhar I. Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 27.09.2020.];49(3):234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
IEEE
D. Plančak, L. Musić i I. Puhar, "Međustanična komunikacija parodontopatogenih bakterija", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.49, br. 3, str. 234-241, 2015. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (258 KB) str. 234-241 preuzimanja: 263* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Plančak, D., Musić, L. i Puhar, I. (2015). Quorum Sensing of Periodontal Pathogens. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49 (3), 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
MLA 8th Edition
Plančak, Darije, et al. "Quorum Sensing of Periodontal Pathogens." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 49, br. 3, 2015, str. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6. Citirano 27.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Plančak, Darije, Larisa Musić i Ivan Puhar. "Quorum Sensing of Periodontal Pathogens." Acta stomatologica Croatica 49, br. 3 (2015): 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
Harvard
Plančak, D., Musić, L., i Puhar, I. (2015). 'Quorum Sensing of Periodontal Pathogens', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 49(3), str. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
Vancouver
Plančak D, Musić L, Puhar I. Quorum Sensing of Periodontal Pathogens. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2015 [pristupljeno 27.09.2020.];49(3):234-241. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6
IEEE
D. Plančak, L. Musić i I. Puhar, "Quorum Sensing of Periodontal Pathogens", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.49, br. 3, str. 234-241, 2015. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc49/3/6

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Pojam quorum sensing označava međustaničnu komunikaciju bakterija kojom koordiniraju gensku ekspresiju populacije sukladno njezinoj gustoći. Bakterije proizvode i ispuštaju u međustanični prostor male molekule, tzv. autoinduktore, čija koncentracija raste s povećanjem populacije. Postizanje koncentracije stimulatornog praga rezultira promjenom u genskoj ekspresiji. Gram-pozitivne i gram-negativne bakterije imaju različite quorum sensing sustave. Najbolje istražen,kanonski sustav jest LuxI/R-tip/acil homoserin laktonom posredovan quorum sensing sustavom gram-negativnih bakterija koje ga koriste uglavnom za komunikaciju unutar svoje vrste. Gram-pozitivne bakterije posjeduju quorum sensing sustav posredovan peptidima. Bakterije mogu komunicirati unutar svoje vrste, ali i s bakterijama drugih vrsta, što im omogućuje autoinduktor-
2 quorum sensing sustav koji se zato i naziva univerzalnim bakterijskim jezikom. Parodontopatogene bakterije imaju AI-2 quorum sensing sustav. Poznato je da njime kontroliraju formaciju
biofilmova, unos željeza, odgovor na stres i ekspresiju pojedinih faktora virulencije. Bolje razumijevanje mehanizama bakterijske komunikacije omogućit će utjecanje na quorum sensing inhibitorima u svrhu sprječavanja i kontrole bolesti.

Ključne riječi
quorum sensing; bakterije, gram-pozitivne; bakterije, gram-negativne; parodontitis

Hrčak ID: 145317

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/145317

▼ Article Information



Introduction

Up until several decades ago and groundbreaking discoveries in the field of molecular microbiology, bacteria were believed to be independently functioning single-celled organisms, living a self-sufficient lifestyle (1). In the mid-20th century several pioneer studies conducted on marine bacteria showed that bacterial cells actually favor living in close proximity to such an extent that the number of the organisms adhering to a firm surface greatly surpasses the number of the free swimming, planktonic organisms in the surrounding liquid media (2, 3). It was further confirmed and is now a well-known fact that bacteria prefer living in complex surface-associated communities which were later named biofilms (4).

Biofilm can be defined as an aggregation of one or more groups of different microorganisms, embedded in a self-produced matrix and adhering to a firm surface. Biofilms are ubiquitous. Bacteria can form them on the greatest variety of surfaces, living or non-living, in humid natural conditions, on medical equipment and living tissue, but also in the most extreme living conditions. Recent studies have described bacterial biofilms found in the extreme subzero temperatures of the Antarctic seawaters, thermal waters ranging from 35 to 50 degrees Celsius and conditions of extreme acidity, high metal content and lack of nutrients (5-7).

Bacterial colonies make up approximately 15-20% of the biofilm volume while the rest is an EPS matrix in which the colonies are embedded, a mixture of different natural polymers, primarily polysaccharides, but also a variety of proteins, glycoproteins, glycolipids, and also nucleic acids (8). The surrounding matrix has many important roles in the lives of its inhabitants. It represents a sort of a safe haven for the bacterial colonies, acting as a ward against sometimes extreme changes of environmental conditions, making it easier to understand why bacteria prefer life in biofilms than that in the form of planktonic organisms (9, 10).

Biofilms can be formed from a single-species bacterial community or, which is more typical, represent a community derived from several different microbial species living an interdependent lifestyle. A fact worth mentioning is that even in the mono-species biofilms, phenotypic heterogeneity exists as a response of the individual bacterial cells to local microenvironment conditions (11). Dental plaque biofilm and biofilm in periodontal diseases are among the best described multi-species biofilms. What characterizes these biofilms is their formation on non-shedding surfaces (teeth, fixed prosthodontic appliances) which subsequently enables the formation of stable and complex bacterial communities.

Bearing all of the presented information on bacterial biofilm communities in mind, an inevitable question arises; how do these communities coordinate their behavior?

A glimpse in the history of quorum sensing

Quorum sensing as a form of bacterial communication was first described a little over 30 years ago in a bioluminescent marine bacteria, Aliivibrio (Vibrio) fisheri (12). Until then social cooperation was thought to be a distinctive feature of ‘higher’, developed organisms. Symbiotic relationship between Aliivibrio fischeri and Hawaiian bobtail squid, Euprymna scolopes, has been studied thoroughly and it was the key finding for understanding how bacterial communication works (13). Hawaiian bobtail squid is a nocturnal hunter living in, as its name suggests, clear Hawaiian shallow coastal waters. Its light organ houses bioluminescent bacteria, Aliivibrio fischeri, producing the right amount of light during the night, squid's active hours thus camouflaging their host. Namely, the light from the moon and the stars would normally make the silhouette of the squid stand out to predators below. By emitting a glow from its underside, the squid mimics ambient night light and virtually has no silhouette and creates no shadow. In turn, the bacteria in the squid's light organ feed on sugar and amino-acids. Aliivibrio fischeri is a planktonic bacterium and its quantities are virtually undetectable in ocean waters. The squid’s circadial pump pumps in and out the water containing Aliivibrio fischeri. Every morning at dawn, the squid disposes of up to 95% of Aliivibrio fischeri from the light organ. Concentration of the bacterial population in the light organ increases during the day and by nighttime, and when the critical bacterial population is restored, the production of light is enabled (12). The unusual yet rhythmic process of turning the light on and off left researchers asking how bacteria know when it is the right time to start producing light and shutting it off.

Quorum sensing

Quorum, by its definition, is a minimum number of members of a certain assembly required to be present in order to make a certain decision. Bacterial quorum implies a minimum, critical concentration of bacterial cells in a population which leads to common, coordinated gene expression and coordinated response to changes in their environment. Quorum sensing can thus be defined as a regulation of gene expression in accordance with cell-population density.

Bacteria produce and secrete chemical signaling molecule, autoinducers. Extracellular concentration of these molecules increases as a function of bacterial cell density. When bacteria detect the minimal threshold stimulatory concentration of a certain autoinducer they act accordingly and alter their behavior in response to it. Quorum sensing can be divided into 4 steps: 1) intracellular synthesis of the signal molecules, 2) secretion of the molecules, either actively or passively, 3) detection of the signaling molecule and its binding to an inducer and 4) gene transcription activation (Figure 1) (13-15).

Figure 1 Quorum sensing mechanism – from signaling molecule production to gene transcription.
ASC_49(3)_234-241-f1

Quorum sensing systems

Quorum sensing in Gram-Negative bacteria

The type of quorum sensing system as described in Aliivibrio fischeri is the most common quorum sensing system and has so far been observed in more than 70 bacterial species. Two proteins, LuxI (autoinducer synthase which produces acyl-homoserine lactone autoinducer) and LuxR (autoinducer receptor, which is the DNA-binding transcriptional activator) control the gene expression in Aliivibrio fischeri (13). This type of system, regulated by LuxI/R homologes described for different species and acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) as an autoinducer molecule, is mainly used for intra-species communication (16).

Quorum sensing in Gram-Positive bacteria

Unlike Gram-Negative bacteria, Gram-Positive bacteria use modified oligopeptides in the role of autoinducers which are detected by two-component membrane bound histidine kinase receptors (14).

Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) quorum sensing

While both Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive bacteria possess a certain quorum sensing system which enables them to communicate within their own species, to live in a complex biofilm, in a heterogenic community and it requires communication and behavior coordination in a common language. Autoinducer-2 represents a universal autoinducer molecule that enables inter-species communication and was first discovered as the autoinducer of the second quorum sensing system in the marine bacteria Vibrio harveyi (13, 14). Gene luxS of Vibrio harveyi was identified as the encoder of the synthase enzyme that produces autoinducer-2 while, later on, the genes exhibiting sequence similarity were also found in other Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive bacteria (17, 18).

Quorum sensing and the periodontal pathogens

Although studies conducted to characterize quorum sensing systems and quorum sensing coordinated gene expression in periodontal pathogens have mostly been limited to Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis, several reports also identified luxS homologous genes in other pathogens, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Prevotella intermedia and Eikenella corrodens (19, 20). Periodontal pathogens, as well as some other studied oral streptococci species, possess the AI-2 quorum sensing circuit, which enables them inter-species communication in complex bacterial communities of the oral biofilm (19, 21, 22). Acyl homoserine lactone (AHL)-mediated quorum sensing system, similar to the one of Aliivibrio fischeri, has not been found in periodontal pathogens so far (19).

Although microbial etiology in periodontitis is indisputable, disease onset and progression is now associated with population shift within the microbial biofilm community. Periodontal pathogens are overrepresented in samples taken from diseased places, whereas they represent a significantly small portion of the total species in healthy sites (23, 24). The increased complexity and shifts in the microbial community are the result of species association and intra- and inter-species communication.

The role of quorum sensing in biofilm development

The role of quorum sensing in biofilm formation was first studied on non-oral organisms, single-species Pseudomonas aeruginosa community and also biofilm communities comprised of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia species (25). The communication between these bacteria is mediated through AHL signaling quorum sensing systems allowing them to coordinate virulence expression and biofilm formation (26, 27). The ability of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans to grow in biofilm is closely linked to AI-2 quorum sensing system. A luxS gene mutant (no AI-2 synthase) can form a mature biofilm, yet the biofilm contains notably less biomass. If exogenous autoinducer-2 or a functional luxS gene carrying plasmid is added in the growth medium, normal growth of the biofilm is restored (28). Two periplasmic receptors for autoinducer-2, LsrB and RbsB, were also identified and it was observed that if one or both receptors are inactivated, biofilm growth was either reduced, or completely disabled (29). The fact that Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans also responds to a broad range of autoinducer-2 concentration, is a subject of scientific discussion and further research since the aforementioned periplasmic receptors show different kinetics of interaction with the autoinducer. It seems that RbsB interacts with the autoinducer-2 at higher affinity than LsrB, suggesting that Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is able to act upon both lower and higher autoinducer-2 concentrations and thus thrive in biofilms with both low and high cell density (29).

Quorum sensing and bacterial iron-uptake

Iron has an essential role in wide variety of bacterial functions since it influences cell composition, intermediary metabolism, secondary metabolism, enzyme activity and many other functions (30). Autoinducer-2 mediated quorum sensing system is also intimately linked to bacterial iron acquisition which was studied on both Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis. The Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans can acquire iron from either iron-scavenging chelators (enterobactin-like siderophore) or host cell sources (transferrin and hemoglobin). Autoinducer-2 mediated quorum sensing system has a role in adapting bacteria's iron uptake, depending on the bacterial cell density in the biofilm and autoinducer-2 concentration. Mutant strains exhibit reduced expression of genes coding the receptors for hem, transferrin and hemoglobin, thus reducing iron-uptake from the host cells. Simultaneously, despite the luxS mutation and consequently no production of synthase enzyme and autoinducer-2 respectively, expression of several other genes encoding siderophore receptors is upregulated, inducing a shift towards iron uptake from chelators. This suggests that in a high density cell population, with higher concentration of autoinducer-2, bacteria will obtain iron from host-cell sources, whereas it will turn to iron-scavenging chelators in low autoinducer-2 conditions (31, 32).

Porphyromonas gingivalis obtains iron from hemin (iron-containing porphyrin) by employing specific outer membrane receptors, lipoproteins and proteases (33). It is also controlled by an autoinducer-2 mediated signaling which involves independent regulation of distinct uptake mechanisms. Autoinducer-2 positively or negatively regulates different genes that encode membrane receptors, depending on the available hemin content. There is also a link between iron uptake and virulence in Porphyromonas gingivalis, iron starvation resulting in reduced virulence (34).

Quorum sensing and other functions

AI-2 quorum sensing regulation of stress-related genes in Porphyromonas gingivalis has also been studied. It was shown that LuxS might be involved in promoting survival of Porphyromonas gingivalis in the host by regulating its response to host-induced stresses such as high temperature exposure, resistance to hydrogen peroxide, and changes in the pH by elevated expression of stress proteins (35).

A comparison of the luxS mutant and wild type strains of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans showed and confirmed autoinducer-2-dependant regulation of genes encoding proteins of the outer membrane, enzymes, transcriptional regulators and fimbriae components. Expression of bacteria's most powerful virulence factor, leukotoxin, reduces trifold after luxS gene inactivation (31).

Quorum sensing inhibitory drugs

Since modern civilization is on the brink of entering a complete antibiotic resistance era, development of quorum sensing inhibitory drugs is sparking more and more interest. By terminating bacterial communication critical aspects of biofilm formation or expression of virulence factors would be affected (36, 37). A variety of quorum sensing systems and structural diversity of autoinducers must also be taken into account. So far, several naturally occurring quorum sensing inhibitory compounds have been discovered and synthetic derivatives based on the known structure of quorum sensing inducers produced. Components of garlic, vanilla extract, pepper and halogenated furanones produced by the marine alga Delisea pulchra showed quorum sensing inhibitory properties (37-44). Studies have shown that addition of ribose derivatives to culture medium negatively affected the formation of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm, as autoinducer-2 receptors exhibit homology to known ribose binding proteins, with the ribose acting as a receptor antagonist on autoinducer-2 receptors (45). As one study showed, brominated furanones also influence negatively the biofilm formation of Porphyromonas gingivalis, without affecting the bacterial growth (46). Affecting the autoinducer-2 quorum sensing circuits of the periodontal pathogens as a therapeutic intervention also represents a challenge as other oral bacteria, including the host's beneficial commensals; use these circuits to establish their communities (47).

Conclusion

Quorum sensing regulated gene expression and behavior coordination of the bacterial community points to the fact that bacteria are not solitary organisms as they were once thought of by traditional microbiology. Intra- and inter-species communication is the key in biofilm formation which represents an ever rising problem in healthcare, being the cause of persistent and chronic infections. Although bacterial language is not yet understood in its entirety, the importance of research in this field has been recognized.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest The authors deny any conflicts of interest.

References

1 

Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999 May 21;284(5418):1318–22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10334980

2 

Heukelekian H, Heller A. Relation between food concentration and surface for bacterial growth. J Bacteriol. 1940 Oct;40(4):547–58. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16560368

3 

Zobell CE. The Effect of Solid Surfaces upon Bacterial Activity. J Bacteriol. 1943 Jul;46(1):39–56. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16560677

4 

Costerton JW, Geesey GG, Cheng KJ. How bacteria stick. Sci Am. 1978 Jan;238(1):86–95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0178-86 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/635520

5 

Yang SJ, Oh HM, Chung S, Cho JC. Antarcticimonas flava gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from Antarctic coastal seawater. J Microbiol. 2009 Oct;47(5):517–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12275-009-0225-4 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19851722

6 

Jones DS, Tobler DJ, Schaperdoth I, Mainiero M, Macalady JL. Community structure of subsurface biofilms in the thermal sulfidic caves of Acquasanta Terme, Italy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Sep;76(17):5902–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00647-10 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20639361

7 

Campos VL, Escalante G, Yańez J, Zaror CA, Mondaca MA. Isolation of arsenite-oxidizing bacteria from a natural biofilm associated to volcanic rocks of Atacama Desert, Chile. J Basic Microbiol. 2009 Sep;49 Suppl 1:S93–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200900028 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19718679

8 

Flemming HC, Neu TR, Wozniak D. The EPS Matrix: The “House of Biofilm Cells”. J Bacteriol. 2007 Nov;189(22):7945–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00858-07 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17675377

9 

Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Sep;8(9):623–33. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20676145

10 

Watnick P, Kolter R. Biofilm, City of Microbes. J Bacteriol. 2000 May;182(10):2675–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.10.2675-2679.2000 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10781532

11 

Stewart PS, Franklin MJ. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Mar;6(3):199–210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1838 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18264116

12 

Nealson KH, Hastings JW. Bacterial bioluminesence: its control and ecological significance. Microbiol Rev. 1979 Dec;43(4):496–518. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/396467

13 

Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:165–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11544353

14 

Waters CM, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:319–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16212498

15 

Sifri CD. Quorum sensing: Bacteria Talk Sense. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 15;47(8):1070–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/592072 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18781869

16 

Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012 Nov 1;2(11) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012427 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23125205

17 

Surette MG, Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: a new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1639–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1639 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9990077

18 

DeKeersmaecker SC, Vanderleyden J. Constraints on detection of autoinducer-2 (AI-2) signalling molecules using Vibrio harveyi as a reporter. Microbiology. 2003 Aug;149(Pt 8):1953–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.C0117-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12904534

19 

Frias J, Olle E, Alsina M. Periodontal pathogens produce quorum sensing signal molecules. Infect Immun. 2001 May;69(5):3431–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.69.5.3431-3434.2001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11292769

20 

Azakami H, Teramura I, Matsunaga T, Akimichi H, Noiri Y, Ebisu S, et al. Characterization of autoinducer 2 signal in Eikenella corrodens and its role in biofilm formation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2006 Aug;102(2):110–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.102.110 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17027872

21 

Chung WO, Park Y, Lamont RJ, McNab R, Barbieri B, Demuth DR. Signaling system in Porphyromonas gingivalis based on a LuxS protein. J Bacteriol. 2001 Jul;183(13):3903–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.13.3903-3909.2001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11395453

22 

Fong KP, Chung WO, Lamont RJ, Demuth DR. Intra- and interspecies regulation of gene expression by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans LuxS. Infect Immun. 2001 Dec;69(12):7625–34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.69.12.7625-7634.2001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11705942

23 

Marsh PD. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology. 2003 Feb;149(Pt 2):279–94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26082-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12624191

24 

Berezow AB, Darveau RP. Microbial Shift and Periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2011 Feb;55(1):36–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00350.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21134227

25 

Juhas M, Eberl L, Tümmler B. Quorum sensing: the power of cooperation in the world of Pseudomonas. Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;7(4):459–71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00769.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15816912

26 

Conibear TCR, Collins SL, Webb JS. Role of mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. PLoS One. 2009 Jul 16;4(7):e6289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006289 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19606212

27 

Riedel K, Hentzer M, Geisenberger O, Huber B, Steidle A, Wu H, et al. N-acylhomoserine-lactone-mediated communication between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia in mixed biofilms. Microbiology. 2001 Dec;147(Pt 12):3249–62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-12-3249 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11739757

28 

Shao H, Lamont RJ, Demuth DR. Autoinducer 2 is required for biofilm growth of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans. Infect Immun. 2007 Sep;75(9):4211–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00402-07 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17591788

29 

Shao H, James D, Lamont RJ, Demuth DR. Differential Interaction of Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans LsrB and RbsB Proteins with Autoinducer 2. J Bacteriol. 2007 Aug;189(15):5559–65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00387-07 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17526716

30 

Messenger AJM, Barcla R. Bacteria, iron and pathogenicity. Biochem Educ. 1983;11(2):54–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(83)90043-2

31 

Fong KP, Gao L, Demuth DR. luxS and arcB control aerobix growth of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans under iron limitation. Infect Immun. 2003 Jan;71(1):298–308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.71.1.298-308.2003 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12496179

32 

Henderson B, Curtis MA, Seymour RM, Donos N. Periodontal Medicine and Systems Biology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.

33 

Vasil ML, Ochsner UA. The response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to iron: genetics, biochemistry and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 1999 Nov;34(3):399–413. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01586.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10564483

34 

James CE, Hasegawa Y, Park Y, Yeung V, Tribble GD, Kuboniwa M, et al. LuxS involvement in the regulation of genes coding for hemin and iron acquisition systems in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun. 2006 Jul;74(7):3834–44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01768-05 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16790755

35 

Yuan L, Hillman JD, Progulske-Fox A. Microarray analysis of quorum-sensing-regulated genes in Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun. 2005 Jul;73(7):4146–54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.7.4146-4154.2005 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15972504

36 

Lieberman JM. Appropriate antibiotic use and why it is important: the challenges of bacterial resistance. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Dec;22(12):1143–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000101851.57263.63 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14688589

37 

Bhardwaj AK, Vinothkumar K, Rajpara N. Bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors: attractive alternatives for control of infectious pathogens showing multiple drug resistance. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2013 Apr;8(1):68–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574891X11308010012 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394143

38 

Manefield M, Rasmussen TB, Henzter M, Andersen JB, Steinberg P, Kjelleberg S, et al. Halogenated furanones inhibit quorum sensing through accelerated LuxR turnover. Microbiology. 2002 Apr;148(Pt 4):1119–27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-4-1119 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11932456

39 

Bhardwaj AK, Vinothkumar K, Rajpara N. Bacterial quorum sensing inhibitors: attractive alternatives for control of infectious pathogens showing multiple drug resistance. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2013 Apr;8(1):68–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574891X11308010012 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23394143

40 

Bodini SF, Manfredini S, Epp M, Valentini S, Santori F. Quorum sensing inhibition activity of garlic extract and p-coumaric acid. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 Nov;49(5):551–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02704.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19709367

41 

Choo JH, Rukayadi Y, Hwang JK. Inhibition of bacterial quorum sensing by vanilla extract. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Jun;42(6):637–41. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16706905

42 

Persson T, Hansen TH, Rasmussen TB, Skindersř ME, Givskov M, Nielsen J. Rational design and synthesis of new quorum-sensing inhibitors derived from acylated homoserine lactones and natural products from garlic. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Jun;42(6):637–41. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16706905

43 

Ren D, Bedzyk LA, Ye RW, Thomas SM, Wood TK. Differential gene expression shows natural brominated furanones interfere with the autoinducer-2 bacterial signaling system of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 5;88(5):630–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.20259 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15470704

44 

Tan LY, Yin WF, Chan KG. Piper nigrum, Piper betle and Gnetum gnemon--natural food sources with anti-quorum sensing properties. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Mar 20;13(3):3975–85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s130303975 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23519352

45 

James D, Shao H, Lamont RJ, Demuth DR. The Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans ribose binding protein RbsB interacts with cognate and heterologous autoinducer 2 signals. Infect Immun. 2006 Jul;74(7):4021–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01741-05 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16790775

46 

Zhang L, Wang S, Zhou X, Xui Y. Quorum sensing inhibitor brominated furanone affects Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Oct;29(5):469–72. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22165111

47 

Rickard AH, Palmer RJ Jr, Blehert DS, Campagna SR, Semmelhack MF, Egland PG, et al. Autoinducer 2: a concentration-dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth. Mol Microbiol. 2006 Jun;60(6):1446–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05202.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16796680


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.

[engleski]

Posjeta: 1.001 *