hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253

Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling

Dubravko Pejdo
Claudia Kruschel
Stewart Schultz
Ivana Zubak ; University of Zadar, Department of Ecology, Agriculture and Aquaculture, Trg kneza Višeslava 9, 23000 Zadar, Croatia
Danijel Kanski ; WWF Adria, Budmanijeva 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Martina Markov ; Kornati National Park, Department for Protection, Maintenance, Conservation and Use, Butina 2, 22243, Murter, Croatia
Petra Peleš ; Ires Ekologija, Baruna Filipovića 21, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (987 KB) str. 253-260 preuzimanja: 431* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Pejdo, D., Kruschel, C., Schultz, S., Zubak, I., Kanski, D., Markov, M. i Peleš, P. (2016). Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling. Pomorski zbornik, Special edition (1), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253
MLA 8th Edition
Pejdo, Dubravko, et al. "Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling." Pomorski zbornik, vol. Special edition, br. 1, 2016, str. 253-260. https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253. Citirano 04.12.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Pejdo, Dubravko, Claudia Kruschel, Stewart Schultz, Ivana Zubak, Danijel Kanski, Martina Markov i Petra Peleš. "Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling." Pomorski zbornik Special edition, br. 1 (2016): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253
Harvard
Pejdo, D., et al. (2016). 'Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling', Pomorski zbornik, Special edition(1), str. 253-260. https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253
Vancouver
Pejdo D, Kruschel C, Schultz S, Zubak I, Kanski D, Markov M i sur. Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling. Pomorski zbornik [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 04.12.2020.];Special edition(1):253-260. https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253
IEEE
D. Pejdo, et al., "Fish Monitoring in Kornati National Park: Baited, Remote, Underwater Video (BRUV) Versus Trammel Net Sampling", Pomorski zbornik, vol.Special edition, br. 1, str. 253-260, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.18048/2016-00.253

Sažetak
We evaluated (1) the suitability of two alternative methods for fish monitoring: trammel net sampling and BRUV (Baited Remote Underwater Video), and (2) the potential to cross-calibrate the methods based on a set of shared species with high catch probabilities. A statistical power analysis concluded that BRUV can be conducted with sufficient sample size to perceive small changes in fish populations with high power, and therefore can be used as a sentinel monitoring method. We found that fish species detected by both methods amounted to almost a third of the number of species in each method’s catch, and that 90% of these species are candidates for cross-calibration. 74% of the species at BRUV and 50% at trammel had occurrence probabilities above 10%, a reasonable threshold allowing stock assessment of these species. The sampled and predicted total species richness, extrapolated from the species accumulation curves, were almost identical across methods. We conclude that cross-calibrating the two methods and eventual replacement of the trammel method with non-destructive BRUV is
feasible. The most effective areas of improvement are increased BRUV night-sampling effort and increased total sampling size to increase the statistical power of BRUV as a monitoring tool. This
work has been supported under the Croatian Science Foundation under the project COREBIO (3107).

Ključne riječi
Baited Remote Underwater Video; Trammel net; Monitoring; Method cross-calibration; Species richness

Hrčak ID: 154982

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/154982

Posjeta: 729 *