hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392

Who Should Finance Childcare? Multilevel Analysis of 24 Countries

Ivana Dobrotić   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-3234 ; Studijski centar socijalnog rada, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu
Tanja Vučković Juroš   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-883X ; Studijski centar socijalnog rada, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu

Puni tekst: hrvatski, PDF (2 MB) str. 357-358 preuzimanja: 194* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Dobrotić, I. i Vučković Juroš, T. (2016). Tko bi trebao financirati skrb za djecu? Višerazinska analiza 24 zemlje. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 23 (3), 357-358. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392
MLA 8th Edition
Dobrotić, Ivana i Tanja Vučković Juroš. "Tko bi trebao financirati skrb za djecu? Višerazinska analiza 24 zemlje." Revija za socijalnu politiku, vol. 23, br. 3, 2016, str. 357-358. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392. Citirano 29.09.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Dobrotić, Ivana i Tanja Vučković Juroš. "Tko bi trebao financirati skrb za djecu? Višerazinska analiza 24 zemlje." Revija za socijalnu politiku 23, br. 3 (2016): 357-358. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392
Harvard
Dobrotić, I., i Vučković Juroš, T. (2016). 'Tko bi trebao financirati skrb za djecu? Višerazinska analiza 24 zemlje', Revija za socijalnu politiku, 23(3), str. 357-358. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392
Vancouver
Dobrotić I, Vučković Juroš T. Tko bi trebao financirati skrb za djecu? Višerazinska analiza 24 zemlje. Revija za socijalnu politiku [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 29.09.2020.];23(3):357-358. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392
IEEE
I. Dobrotić i T. Vučković Juroš, "Tko bi trebao financirati skrb za djecu? Višerazinska analiza 24 zemlje", Revija za socijalnu politiku, vol.23, br. 3, str. 357-358, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v23i3.1392

Sažetak
This paper examines how the individual and country-level factors affect the childcare financing attitudes, particularly the effect of socialization in a particular welfare regime. This area of research is fraught with methodological and conceptual issues, including the over-reliance on Esping-Andersen’s regime typology. Therefore, the authors also investigate whether a more family-policy-nuanced categorization of welfare regimes better accounts for the cross-country variations in childcare attitudes. Using the 2012 ISSP data, the authors conducted the multilevel analysis of 24 European countries, and while the effect of most predictors is generally consistent with the previous research, this study’s most important finding is that the alternative Leitner’s “Varieties of Familialism” typology better accounts for the cross-national variations in childcare attitudes than the classical Esping-Anderson's typology. This speaks of the importance of a programmatic approach in the welfare state attitudes analysis which links the public support for specific social programs to its unique characteristics.

Ključne riječi
childcare attitudes; ISSP; welfare state regimes; multilevel analysis; state; family

Hrčak ID: 170367

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/170367

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 417 *