hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Review article

PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA GRADING SYSTEM ACCORDING TO 2016 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION CLASSIFICATION OF TUMORS

Božo Krušlin
Tihana Džombeta
Davor Tomas
Monika Ulamec

Fulltext: croatian, pdf (681 KB) pages 0-0 downloads: 2.750* cite
APA 6th Edition
Krušlin, B., Džombeta, T., Tomas, D. & Ulamec, M. (2017). ODREĐIVANJE GRADUSA ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE PREMA KLASIFIKACIJI SVJETSKE ZDRAVSTVENE ORGANIZACIJE IZ 2016. GODINE. Liječnički vjesnik, 139 (3-4), 0-0. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331
MLA 8th Edition
Krušlin, Božo, et al. "ODREĐIVANJE GRADUSA ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE PREMA KLASIFIKACIJI SVJETSKE ZDRAVSTVENE ORGANIZACIJE IZ 2016. GODINE." Liječnički vjesnik, vol. 139, no. 3-4, 2017, pp. 0-0. https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331. Accessed 9 Jul. 2020.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krušlin, Božo, Tihana Džombeta, Davor Tomas and Monika Ulamec. "ODREĐIVANJE GRADUSA ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE PREMA KLASIFIKACIJI SVJETSKE ZDRAVSTVENE ORGANIZACIJE IZ 2016. GODINE." Liječnički vjesnik 139, no. 3-4 (2017): 0-0. https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331
Harvard
Krušlin, B., et al. (2017). 'ODREĐIVANJE GRADUSA ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE PREMA KLASIFIKACIJI SVJETSKE ZDRAVSTVENE ORGANIZACIJE IZ 2016. GODINE', Liječnički vjesnik, 139(3-4), pp. 0-0. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331 (Accessed 09 July 2020)
Vancouver
Krušlin B, Džombeta T, Tomas D, Ulamec M. ODREĐIVANJE GRADUSA ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE PREMA KLASIFIKACIJI SVJETSKE ZDRAVSTVENE ORGANIZACIJE IZ 2016. GODINE. Liječnički vjesnik [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 July 09];139(3-4):0-0. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331
IEEE
B. Krušlin, T. Džombeta, D. Tomas and M. Ulamec, "ODREĐIVANJE GRADUSA ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE PREMA KLASIFIKACIJI SVJETSKE ZDRAVSTVENE ORGANIZACIJE IZ 2016. GODINE", Liječnički vjesnik, vol.139, no. 3-4, pp. 0-0, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331. [Accessed: 09 July 2020]

Abstracts
Gleason score, a measure of tumor differentiation, is a standard part of prostatic adenocarcinoma pathology report. It represents the sum of the most common and the second most common histological patterns in tumor, and can have a score of 2 to 10. After the introduction of Gleason grading system, some disadvantages were noted in routine practice. The most commonly used patterns were 6 (3+3) and 7 (3+4 or 4+3). Over the years, the Gleason grading system underwent a few revisions. In the current 2016 WHO classification, a five-grade group system was accepted, which is easier to apply and has a much better correlation to prognosis and therapeutic needs of patients. The major differences between old and new grading systems are specified in this review.

Keywords
Adenocarcinoma – pathology; Prostatic neoplasms – classifi cation, pathology; Neoplasm grading – methods

Hrčak ID: 184331

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/184331

[croatian]

Visits: 2.847 *