APA 6th Edition Marušić, B. (2017). TUMAČENJE I PRIMJENA DEFINICIJE GENOCIDA KROZ PRESUDE MKSJ-a. Polemos, XX (39-40), 53-82. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/195407
MLA 8th Edition Marušić, Bartul. "TUMAČENJE I PRIMJENA DEFINICIJE GENOCIDA KROZ PRESUDE MKSJ-a." Polemos, vol. XX, br. 39-40, 2017, str. 53-82. https://hrcak.srce.hr/195407. Citirano 07.03.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Marušić, Bartul. "TUMAČENJE I PRIMJENA DEFINICIJE GENOCIDA KROZ PRESUDE MKSJ-a." Polemos XX, br. 39-40 (2017): 53-82. https://hrcak.srce.hr/195407
Harvard Marušić, B. (2017). 'TUMAČENJE I PRIMJENA DEFINICIJE GENOCIDA KROZ PRESUDE MKSJ-a', Polemos, XX(39-40), str. 53-82. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195407 (Datum pristupa: 07.03.2021.)
Vancouver Marušić B. TUMAČENJE I PRIMJENA DEFINICIJE GENOCIDA KROZ PRESUDE MKSJ-a. Polemos [Internet]. 2017 [pristupljeno 07.03.2021.];XX(39-40):53-82. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195407
IEEE B. Marušić, "TUMAČENJE I PRIMJENA DEFINICIJE GENOCIDA KROZ PRESUDE MKSJ-a", Polemos, vol.XX, br. 39-40, str. 53-82, 2017. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195407. [Citirano: 07.03.2021.]
Sažetak Following the fate of the Second World War, the international community, aware of the disproportions of the political holocaust, in the revitalized form of the League of Peoples, ie the United Nations, adopted the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which came into force on 12 January 1951. Its declarative and preventive purpose reached unwanted repressive too, since the convention began to “apply” to cases of serious violations of the laws and customs of war, especially in the nineties of the last century. Its definition has been implemented in almost all normative acts regulating criminal or international criminal law, including the Croatian Criminal Code, the Rome Statute, the Statute of the ICTY and the ICTR and many others. However, the definition could not foresee all the forms that this terrible criminal offense is properly undergoing, so many interpretations have been made, both by lawyers and judges, through the cases to which they will be concerned. Borislav Herak was the first convicted for genocide after the Second World War in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1993, then Jorgic in Germany in 1997 for the Doboj municipality, and general Radislav Krstic was convicted in the ICTY in 1998 when Akayesu in ICTR. The state has never been convicted of genocide, and Serbia has been blamed for “just” failing to take adequate measures to prevent genocide (in Srebrenica), which has become the only one that has formally violated the Convention, but is not directly pronounced accountable for carrying out genocide by the Bosnian Serbs. The paper analyzes the judgments of the ICTY and their development of the definition of genocide and various manifestations of the most serious crime.