hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5

Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro

Nurul Aqilah Salim ; Student diplomskog studija, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište Sains Malaysia, Zdravstveni kampus Kelantan, Malezija
Nor Aidaniza Abdul Muttlib   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-6541 ; Zavod za stomatološku protetiku, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište Sains Malaysia, Zdravstveni kampus Kelantan, Malezija
Rabihah Alawi   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-9712 ; Conservative Zavod za konzervativnu stomatologiju, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište Sains Malaysia, Zdravstveni kampus Kelantan, Malezija
Normastura Abd rahman ; Zavod ja javno zdravstvo, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište Sains Malaysia, Zdravstveni kampus Kelantan, Malezija
Zaihan Ariffin ; Zavod za stomatološku protetiku, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište Sains Malaysia, Zdravstveni kampus Kelantan, Malezija

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (204 KB) str. 218-226 preuzimanja: 118* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Salim, N.A., Muttlib, N.A.A., Alawi, R., rahman, N.A. i Ariffin, Z. (2018). Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 52 (3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
MLA 8th Edition
Salim, Nurul Aqilah, et al. "Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 52, br. 3, 2018, str. 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5. Citirano 18.04.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Salim, Nurul Aqilah, Nor Aidaniza Abdul Muttlib, Rabihah Alawi, Normastura Abd rahman i Zaihan Ariffin. "Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro." Acta stomatologica Croatica 52, br. 3 (2018): 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
Harvard
Salim, N.A., et al. (2018). 'Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 52(3), str. 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
Vancouver
Salim NA, Muttlib NAA, Alawi R, rahman NA, Ariffin Z. Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2018 [pristupljeno 18.04.2021.];52(3):218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
IEEE
N.A. Salim, N.A.A. Muttlib, R. Alawi, N.A. rahman i Z. Ariffin, "Procjena mikropropuštanja između različitih sustava kolčića i nadogradnji u uvjetima postupnog opterećenja: istraživanje in vitro", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.52, br. 3, str. 218-226, 2018. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (204 KB) str. 218-226 preuzimanja: 188* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Salim, N.A., Muttlib, N.A.A., Alawi, R., rahman, N.A. i Ariffin, Z. (2018). Evaluation of Microleakage Between Different Post and Core Systems Under Gradual Loading: an In-Vitro Study. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 52 (3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
MLA 8th Edition
Salim, Nurul Aqilah, et al. "Evaluation of Microleakage Between Different Post and Core Systems Under Gradual Loading: an In-Vitro Study." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 52, br. 3, 2018, str. 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5. Citirano 18.04.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Salim, Nurul Aqilah, Nor Aidaniza Abdul Muttlib, Rabihah Alawi, Normastura Abd rahman i Zaihan Ariffin. "Evaluation of Microleakage Between Different Post and Core Systems Under Gradual Loading: an In-Vitro Study." Acta stomatologica Croatica 52, br. 3 (2018): 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
Harvard
Salim, N.A., et al. (2018). 'Evaluation of Microleakage Between Different Post and Core Systems Under Gradual Loading: an In-Vitro Study', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 52(3), str. 218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
Vancouver
Salim NA, Muttlib NAA, Alawi R, rahman NA, Ariffin Z. Evaluation of Microleakage Between Different Post and Core Systems Under Gradual Loading: an In-Vitro Study. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2018 [pristupljeno 18.04.2021.];52(3):218-226. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5
IEEE
N.A. Salim, N.A.A. Muttlib, R. Alawi, N.A. rahman i Z. Ariffin, "Evaluation of Microleakage Between Different Post and Core Systems Under Gradual Loading: an In-Vitro Study", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.52, br. 3, str. 218-226, 2018. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/3/5

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Svrha: Istraživanje je usmjereno na usporedbu u razlici spojnog prodora boja između svjetlovodnih kolčića everStick, Parapost XP i Parapost i kontrolnih skupina pod postupnim opterećenjem. Materijali i metode: Šezdeset osam ljudskih maksilarnih trajnih sjekutića podijeljeno je u četiri skupine. Svaki uzorak endodontski je tretiran tehnikom instrumentacije i pripremljen za svaki sustav kolčića prema eksperimentalnim skupinama. Nakon toga kolčić je cementiran u korijenski kanal. Oblikovane nadogradnje od kompozitnog materijala cementirane su u laboratorijski izrađene metalne krunice. Svi su uzorci termociklirani, osim onih u kontrolnoj skupini. Sve su skupine podvrgnute postupnom opterećenju od 0 N do 50 N u 100 ciklusa. Uzorci su poprečno prerezani i izmjerene su dubine penetracije boje uzduž kolčića. Podatci su uneseni u SPSS ver. 22 i analizirani dvosmjernim testom ANOVA-e. Rezultati: Nije bilo značajne razlike u spojnom prodoru boje ni u jednoj skupini (p – vrijednost > 0,05). No zabilježena je značajna razlika u postotku prodora boje između svih skupina (p – vrijednost < 0,05); post-hoc usporedba pokazala je znatnu razliku između Fiber White skupine i one kontrolne (p – vrijednost = 0,009). Zaključak: U svim je skupinama u uzorke prodirala boja, ali postotak je bio značajan samo između Parapost Fiber Whitea i kontrolnih skupina.

Ključne riječi
endodoncija; kolčić-nadogradnja tehnika; vlaknima ojačani polimeri; rubno prijanjanje materijala za punjenje; dentalno propuštanje

Hrčak ID: 205658

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/205658

▼ Article Information



Introduction

The life span of endodontically treated teeth has been upgraded with advancements made in endodontic and restorative procedures (1). Fabrication of post and core becomes part of components in endodontically treated teeth as it gives better outcome to the restoration and facilitates crown retention and support (2).

In order to ensure that the placement of post is beneficial to the tooth, studies were carried out to see how it contributes to the strength of the restoration and preservation of the remaining tooth structure. There were multiple studies on performance of post and cores in relation to fracture resistance (3, 4), materials used (2, 5-10), shape and designs (11-14) and many more were conducted to evaluate the outcome of different systems used. A study on the amount of microleakage between the system and the tooth was crucial for the success of the final restoration (9).

Microleakage is defined as the “diffusion of the bacteria, oral fluids, ions and molecules into the tooth and the filling material interface” or “the clinically undetectable passage of bacteria, fluids, molecules or ions between tooth and the restorative or filling material” (15). The presence of 3 to 5mm apical seal was reported to be “questionable” in terms of preventing microleakage (12).

Fatigue that happens in the structures subjected to dynamic stress was reported to cause microleakage clinically. This factor needs to be considered as microleakage will later cause secondary caries formation that will affect the survival rate and cause failure of the treatment itself (3). Other study reported that bacteria and endotoxins had the ability to penetrate the obturating materials in the post prepared root canals (13). The penetration of bacterial toxins, oral fluids, and other ions will lead to marginal discoloration, secondary caries and marginal fractures. Microleakage had been reported to be the most frequent cause of failure for the post and core system because of the separation of the post from the internal root surface (9). This loss of retention between the post and the root may lead to vertical root fracture, which was the most severe cause of failure with irreversible consequences (16).

A study by Jung et al. (2007) found that there was a difference in the amount of microleakage between group with the dye penetration test performed after dynamic loading and during the repeated loading. The group with repeated loading showed the adhesive failure between the tooth structure and the core where the dye penetrated into a larger area of root dentin. Fogel (1995) evaluated several prefabricated post and core systems with fluid filtration microleakage test and found that none of the systems tested were capable of consistently achieving fluid-tight seal.

In the past, the options for post and core were limited and cast metal post was the only practicable choice for the restorative treatment of severely damaged teeth (17). At present, there was lack of evidence with regard to superiority of the post and core systems related to microleakage under gradual loading. Thus, the aim of this experimental research was to compare the difference in marginal dye penetration between three types of posts under gradual loadings (everStick post, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white) and control groups.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted at Craniofacial Laboratory of the School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus University Sains Malaysia (USM). The sample size was calculated using PS software (Dupont and Plummer, 1997) based on the standard deviation (σ) of the mean gamma count at 7.33 (8) with 80% power and alpha of 0.05. Fifteen teeth were needed in each study group. With anticipation of 10% of the samples from each group which could pose problems during the procedure, 17 teeth were included in each group, to make a total of 68 teeth in this study. All teeth were collected from government and private dental clinics in Peninsular Malaysia.

The human permanent maxillary incisors with straight single-rooted canal, non-carious or carious teeth without pulpal involvement and that limited to 2mm incisal to cementoenamel junction (CEJ) with mature apices or the teeth that were extracted due to periodontal problem and those free from cracks and defects were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included teeth with extra canal, open apices, calcified canal, curved roots, and resorbed roots. The posts used in this study are as shown in Table 1. Rely X U200 (3M ESPE, USA) cement was used to cement the posts and crowns in this study.

Table 1 Types of posts used in the study.
BrandCompositionManufacturer
Parapost XP (P780)Stainless steelColtene Whaledent, USA
Parapost fiber white (PF160)Unidirection glass fiber/resinColtene Whaledent, USA
everStickResin-impregnated uncured glass fiberStick Tech Ltd, Turku, Finland

Specimens Preparation

Root canal preparation

All external debris was removed with an ultrasonic scaler and the teeth were stored in normal saline solution. The coronal section of the teeth were amputated horizontally to the long axis using water cooled diamond fissure bur (Horico, Germany) in air turbine handpiece (Bien Air Dental SA, Switzerland), leaving only 2mm of the coronal part incisal to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) from the buccal surface.

Straight-line access into the coronal third of the canal was made using water cold diamond fissure bur (Horico, Germany) in air turbine handpiece (Bien Air Dental SA, Switzerland). All root canals were instrumented at a working length using the step-back technique. The working length of the teeth was obtained by inserting number 10 file into the canal until it appeared at the apex of the root, then 0.5mm was subtracted from the total length. Intermittent irrigation was made with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, rinsed with saline solution between file sizes and the canals were dried with paper points. The canals were prepared until Master Apical File size of 45 for Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white and control groups, whereas for everStick group the Master Apical File the size was 55. The canal preparation for all groups was continued using 3 sizes of larger files with substraction of 1 mm between each file. Obturation was done using the gutta percha (Meta Biomed, South Korea) and AH26 eugenol free sealer (Dentsply, USA). A radiograph was taken for each specimen to ensure there was no air bubbles present in the canal. After 24 hours of the initial preparation, the gutta percha points in Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white and everStick groups were removed using Gates Glidden (Dentsply, Switzerland) size 2 and size 3 leaving only 5mm at the apex of the root as an apical seal.

The post spaces were prepared for each system with Parapost XP drill and Parapost Fiber White (PF160) drill (Coltane Whaledent, USA). Post space preparation for everStick post was done with Parapost Fiber White (PF160) drill. The posts for Parapost XP and Parapost Fiber White (PF160) were placed in the canals following the canal length prepared with additional of 2mm above the coronal margin. The total length was 4mm from CEJ for each specimen. The recommendation from Fernandes and Dessai (2001) was followed in order to standardize the size and length of the post where the post lengths used were three-quarters of the total root length for each specimen, and the post size was smaller than one-third of the root diameter or as close as possible to this value. The procedure based on report from Le Bell-Rönnlöf et al. (2011) was applied to the everStick group. The bundle fibers of 1.2mm were fitted in the canal, both end were cut to fit leaving 2mm of fiber incisal to the coronal opening. The fibers were then light-polymerized using a light curing device for 40 seconds (Mini L.E.D OEM, France). Next, the fibers were removed and light-cured again outside the canal for another 40 seconds. After that, the additional bundles were fitted next to and attached to the individually formed 1.2mm bundle until the posts were properly fitted in the canal and light cured. The fitting of the posts inside the canals was confirmed with a radiograph. Cementations of all types of posts were performed using self-adhesive resin luting cement (Rely X U200, USA). The resin cement application was based on the manufacturer’s guidelines.

For the control group, no post space preparation was carried out. The core was prepared with 2mm of sound tooth structure, which was included at the margin of the preparation.

Crown Fabrication

A core built up for each specimen was done using composite resin (Filtek™ Z350 XT, USA). The horizontal surfaces of the coronal area of each specimen were firstly etched using 32% phosphoric acid (Scotchbond™ Universal Etchant, USA) for 15 seconds and then washed and dried using triplex syringe. Each tooth was continued with application of bonding agent (3M ESPE Adper Single Bond Plus, USA) and light-cured for 10 seconds followed by composite resin placement incrementally where each layer were light-cured for 40 seconds. Laboratory fabricated metal crowns were used as final restorations and cemented using self-adhesive resin luting cement (Rely X U200, USA) application based on the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Material Testing

Each specimen was coated with 3 layers of commercial nail varnish from the apex to the CEJ level to prevent microleakage at the apex. All groups were subjected to thermal cycling of 2000 cycles in 5º-55ºC water bath with a dwell time of 20 seconds in each bath. The everStick post, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white groups were positioned at 135 degrees to the long axis of the tooth and were loaded for gradual loading from 0N to 50N for 100 cycles (Instron, United Kingdom) (20). The gradual loading test was not performed for the control group.

Marginal leakage testing

After the loading, the everStick post, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white and the control group were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 24 hours at room temperature (21) followed by rinsing with tap water to remove excess dye. All teeth were sectioned transversely from the tooth core interface towards the apex (Exact, Germany) and observed under 30x magnification stereomicroscope (Leica, Germany). Descriptive measurements were made from the photograph of the sectioned tooth followed by measuring the depth of dye penetration along the post preparation area in mm in order to obtain the sign and depth of the leakage. Ratios of dye penetration to entire section of the roots were measured and dye penetration percentages were recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for the IBM Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 was used for data entry. Non parametric analysis using Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to determine and compare the mean depth of dye penetration between everStick, parapost XP, parapost fiber white and control groups while a two-way ANOVA was performed to determine and compare the percentage of dye penetration these groups. The mean score with significant P-value was tested using multiple comparison Post-hoc tests (Scheffe’s procedure). The p-value was set as significant at p<0.05.

Ethical clearance

Ethical clearance was obtained from USM research and approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee (USM/JPEM/15080267).

Results

The dye penetration at the marginal area for each specimen in each group was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and the result showed there was no significance of the median between the groups (p-value =0.193). The median with interquartile range for each group was as stated in Table 2. It showed that everStick group had the highest median while Parapost fiber white group had the lowest median.

Table 2 Comparison of median depth of dye penetration between everStick, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white and control groups.
GroupDye penetration at the margin (μm)
Median (IQR)
p-valuea
Parapost XP1884.23 (1477.360)0.193
Parapost fiber white (PF160)892.43 (1816.050)
everStick2018.01 (1746.130)
Control1919.14 (573.560)

a Kruskal-Wallis test

A two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the percentage of dye penetration between everStick, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white, and control groups. As shown in Table 3, there was a significant difference of the mean of the percentage of dye penetration between the groups with p-value of = 0.009 and the F-statistic value was 4.194 with degree of freedom (df) 3. The mean and standard deviations for each group were as shown in Table 3. The highest mean was presented in the control group while Parapost Fiber White showed the lowest mean.

Table 3 Comparison of mean percentage of dye penetration between everStick, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white and control groups.
GroupPercentage of Dye Penetration at Margin Mean (SD)F-stat (df)p-value
Parapost XP82.97 (48.793)4.194 (3)0.009 a
Parapost fiber white (PF160)49.87 (38.514)
everStick84.71 (28.310)
Control94.68 (19.173)

a post-hoc shows significant difference between Fiber White post and Control group.

Based on the result obtained, there were two samples in everStick group where the penetration of the dye reached the canal area by 60.63% and 42.81%. There was also dye penetration in canal of a sample in Parapost XP group which was by 38.05%, two samples in Parapost Fiber Fhite group which were by 22.97% and 27.41%, and also a sample in the control group which was by 93.64%. All samples in everStick and Parapost XP groups were presented with dye penetration at the marginal area, whereas 15 out of 17 samples in Parapost Fiber White group and 16 out of 17 samples in the control group presented with marginal dye penetration.

Discussion

There were no significant differences in depth of dye penetration between everStick, Parapost XP, Parapost Fiber White, and control groups in this study. These results may be influenced by the presence of 2mm sound tooth structure that acted as a ferrule for each specimen, thus resulting in no difference in the outcome. It had been suggested that the presence of ferrule as part of post and core system would resist functional lever forces and the wedging effect of tapered post (4). The presence of at least 1.5mm ferrule in single rooted teeth was reported to have better resistance to failure. Ferrule provides less impact to the post and core system, luting cements and the final restorations (18-22). This finding was similar to a study by Libman and Nicholls (1995) where the presence of 1.5-2mm ferrules provides better resistance to failure.

The everStick group showed the highest median depth of dye penetration compared to other groups in this study. This result may be influenced by the properties of the everStick material itself. The material itself has sticky behavior in a polymerized state and the fibers have a tendency to separate (23, 24). These factors may cause contamination and alteration to the material itself that prevent the formation of a monoblock with the dentine (25). Another factor that leads to deeper leakage in the everStick group may also be the effect of polymerization shrinkage. As everStick was cured after it was adapted into the canal, polymerization shrinkage may have caused gap formation between the post and the dentinal wall (11). This may have caused the separation of cement when introduced to gradual loading in this study.

Torbjörner et al. (1996) reported that degradation and hydrolysis of the organic matrix occurred in fiber reinforced composite (FRC) post as a reaction to the contact between moisture and resin based material in the FRC itself. The reaction caused the matrix to swell, which later resulted in debonding and/or cracking of the fiber interface. This will increase the water absorption by the FRC post and simultaneously decrease their mechanical properties. An increase in fibers to a polymer matrix will significantly increase the fracture toughness, stiffness and fatigue resistance of the post (26, 27). This statement may explain the reason why Parapost Fiber White post had lower microleakage compared to an everStick post.

Flexural properties of a post play a major role in stress distribution and survival of a post-restored tooth. Our finding was however contradicted with a study by Lassila et al. (2004) where the result from the three-point bending test unexpectedly showed that everStick had the highest flexural strength compared to other tested FRC posts which include Parapost fiber white (28). This may occur due to the difference in polymer matrix of everStick post where there is existence of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) chains which have the ability to plasticize the cross-linked Bisphenol A Glycidyl Methacrylate (bisGMA) based matrix which reduces stress formation at the fiber-matrix-interface during deflection.

We found that Parapost XP had lower microleakage pattern compared to everStick group, which is similar to the finding by Reid et al. (2003). They reported that a nonmetallic group had significant increase in microleakage compared to the metallic groups due to thermocycling process. This might be due to degradation of the polymer that hold the fibers together and/or the fibers themselves were susceptible to stress during thermocycling (2). However, there was no evidence found regarding flexural strength specifically comparisons between the post types and brands.

Based on the two-way ANOVA analysis, there was a significant difference in percentage of dye penetration between the groups where the post-hoc test showed a significant difference between Parapost Fiber White and control groups. The result showed that the group treated with post and core had lower dye penetration within the group compared to the control group that had not been restored with post. In order to reinforce an endodontically treated tooth, post system is used to provide stabilization and fasten the restoration to the remaining tooth structure (29). Thus, it can be concluded that endodontically treated teeth without post placement causes the core to be less stable and at the same time increases the microleakage of the teeth.

This study was performed under gradual loading as an alternative to cyclic loading. Cyclic loading caused flexion to posts and resulted in adhesive failure between the tooth structure and the post and/or the core (3), which explained why some of our samples in each group had dye penetration that reached the canal. Based on study by Naumann et al. (2005), gradual loading test was able to provide the information that was clinically relevant. The gradual loading used in this study is a modification of a testing model previously introduced which was chewing simulation and linear compressive loading. This modification allowed us to do material testing procedure for endodontically treated teeth in a time-saving and inexpensive manner. Linear compressive loading is less favorable for post materials testing since it may result in unequal load capacities not appearing in either dynamic method. Thus, gradual loading had been used following the recommendation by the study.

Although gradual loading could produce results that are clinically relevant, it would be more accurate if the material testing could be done under chewing simulation in which it will be able to mimic the real occlusal forces distribution.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in microleakage between everStick, Parapost XP, Parapost fiber white and control groups. The percentage of marginal dye penetration was significant between Parapost fiber white and the control groups.

Notes

[1] Conflicts of interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was funded by a University Sains Malaysia short-term grant 304/PPSG/61313107.

References

1 

Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):556–62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.006 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14668756

2 

Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of Fatigue Testing on Core Integrity and Post Microleakage of Teeth Restored with Different Post Systems. J Endod. 2003 Feb;29(2):125–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200302000-00010 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12597713

3 

Jung S-H, Min K-S, Chang H-S, Park S-D, Kwon S-N, Bae J-M. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Oct;98(4):270–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60100-0 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17936126

4 

Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Oct;64(4):419–24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90037-D PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2231450

5 

Başaran EG, Ayna E, Halifeoglu M. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Apr;107(4):239–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60069-9 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22475467

6 

Qing H, Zhu Z, Chao Y, Zhang W. In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Feb;97(2):93–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.008 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17341377

7 

Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod. 1998 Nov;24(11):703–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80157-X PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9855817

8 

Geramipanah F, Rezaei SMM, Sichani SF, Sichani BF, Sadighpour L. Microleakage of Different Post Systems and a Custom Adapted Fiber Post. J Dent (Tehran). 2013 Jan;10(1):94–102. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23724207

9 

Simel TAEC. Evaluation of Coronal Microleakage in Two Different Post-Core Systems -Original Research. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2011;1(3):163–8.

10 

Fogel HM. Microleakage of posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1995 Jul;21(7):376–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80974-X PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7499979

11 

Makarewicz D, Le Bell-Rönnlöf A-MB, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Effect of Cementation Technique of Individually Formed Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post on Bond Strength and Microleakage. Open Dent J. 2013 Jul 26;7:68–75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601307010068 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986792

12 

Wu MK, Pehlivan Y, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Mar;79(3):264–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70235-5 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9553877

13 

Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):284–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113706 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11264937

14 

Cagidiaco MC, Garcia-Godoy F, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am J Dent. 2008 Jun;21(3):179–84. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18686771

15 

Muliyar S, Shameem KA, Thankachan RP, Francis PG, Jayapalan CS, Hafiz KAA. Microleakage in Endodontics. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):99–104. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628496

16 

Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The Prosthodontic Management of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Literature Review. Part I. Success and Failure Data, Treatment Concepts. J Prosthodont. 1994 Dec;3(4):243–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00162.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7866508

17 

Sokol DJ. Effective use of current core and post concepts. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Aug;52(2):231–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90101-X PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6381706

18 

Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jul-Aug;14(4):355–63. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11508092

19 

Le Bell-Rönnlöf A-M, Lassila LVJ, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Load-bearing capacity of human incisor restored with various fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater. 2011 Jun;27(6):e107–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.009 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21444107

20 

Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Proschel P. Evaluation of load testing of postendodontic restorations in vitro: linear compressive loading, gradual cycling loading and chewing simulation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.

21 

Khier S, Hassan K. Efficacy of Composite Restorative Techniques in Marginal Sealing of Extended Class V Cavities. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:180197. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/180197 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991457

22 

Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):11–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152612

23 

Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Mar-Apr;8(2):155–61. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7575967

24 

Parčina I. Amižić, Baraba A. Esthetic Intracanal Posts. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016 Jun;50(2):143–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc50/2/7 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789912

25 

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals - a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):391–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.009 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17368325

26 

Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):605–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00149.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9021333

27 

Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater. 2005 Feb;21(2):75–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.012 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15681005

28 

Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004 Jan;20(1):29–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00065-4 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14698771

29 

Ricketts DN, Tait CM, Higgins AJ. Post and core systems, refinements to tooth preparation and cementation. Br Dent J. 2005 May 14;198(9):533–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812300 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15895045


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.

[engleski]

Posjeta: 493 *