hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3

ANTICHRESIS IN ROMAN LEGAL DOCTRINE

Ines Matić   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0002-6101-8445 ; University of Rijeka Faculty of Law, Rijeka, Croatia
Anamari Petranović ; University of Rijeka Faculty of Law, Rijeka, Croatia

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (363 KB) str. 1153-1168 preuzimanja: 452* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Matić, I. i Petranović, A. (2018). ANTIHREZA U RIMSKOJ PRAVNOJ DOKTRINI. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 39 (3), 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3
MLA 8th Edition
Matić, Ines i Anamari Petranović. "ANTIHREZA U RIMSKOJ PRAVNOJ DOKTRINI." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol. 39, br. 3, 2018, str. 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3. Citirano 28.09.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
Matić, Ines i Anamari Petranović. "ANTIHREZA U RIMSKOJ PRAVNOJ DOKTRINI." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 39, br. 3 (2018): 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3
Harvard
Matić, I., i Petranović, A. (2018). 'ANTIHREZA U RIMSKOJ PRAVNOJ DOKTRINI', Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 39(3), str. 1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3
Vancouver
Matić I, Petranović A. ANTIHREZA U RIMSKOJ PRAVNOJ DOKTRINI. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci [Internet]. 2018 [pristupljeno 28.09.2021.];39(3):1153-1168. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3
IEEE
I. Matić i A. Petranović, "ANTIHREZA U RIMSKOJ PRAVNOJ DOKTRINI", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, vol.39, br. 3, str. 1153-1168, 2018. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.3.3

Sažetak
The paper addresses the problem of definition and content of the antichresis institute approaching the fragments in Justinian’s Digest (Marcian’s D.13.7.33. and D.20.1.11.1; Paul’s D.20.2.8) since their fundamental reference as the only Roman legal sources that explicitly address this institute. The analysis of Marcian’s passages D.13.7.33. and D.20.1.11.1, along with relevant accents of legal doctrine, outlines
the key elements of antichresis and presents the theories referring legal nature of this institute, suggesting that antichresis and pactum antichreticum are not synonyms (as / has been/ usually presumed), but occur as two different legal institutes thus including essentially different functions, and consequently, different system of legal protection.
Segment of the paper focused on the analysis of Paul’s text D.20.2.8., introduces the basic features of tacit antichresis (antichresis tacita) correlated with the concept of consensual antichresis.

Ključne riječi
pactum antichreticum; antichresis; tacit antichresis; Roman law; innominate contracts; pledge

Hrčak ID: 216560

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/216560

[hrvatski] [njemački] [talijanski]

Posjeta: 869 *