APA 6th Edition Mihanović, D. (2005). Granice (EU)rope. Politička misao, 42 (3), 141-154. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/20956
MLA 8th Edition Mihanović, Dino. "Granice (EU)rope." Politička misao, vol. 42, br. 3, 2005, str. 141-154. https://hrcak.srce.hr/20956. Citirano 27.11.2020.
Chicago 17th Edition Mihanović, Dino. "Granice (EU)rope." Politička misao 42, br. 3 (2005): 141-154. https://hrcak.srce.hr/20956
Harvard Mihanović, D. (2005). 'Granice (EU)rope', Politička misao, 42(3), str. 141-154. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/20956 (Datum pristupa: 27.11.2020.)
Vancouver Mihanović D. Granice (EU)rope. Politička misao [Internet]. 2005 [pristupljeno 27.11.2020.];42(3):141-154. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/20956
IEEE D. Mihanović, "Granice (EU)rope", Politička misao, vol.42, br. 3, str. 141-154, 2005. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/20956. [Citirano: 27.11.2020.]
Sažetak Whilst completing the largest enlargement round in its history,
European Union faced the need to define both its identity and nature
and limits of its future borders. In the aftermath of the failed constitutional referenda and suspension of the ratification process, the pace of future enlargement will inevitably slow down. This has already
been the case with the East European countries during the 1990s,
whose membership perspective was overclouded by Union’s internal
issues. Expansion of the EU will undoubtedly continue, but its present
absorption capacity has reached endpoint. The chance for the institutional reform, through which future enlargement would keep
momentum, has been discarded together with the rejection of Constitutional Treaty. The main issue of todays EU’s relations with immediate neighbourhood is the way to ensure democratic consolidation and Europeanisation of these states in absence of the full membership perspective. Upon that European Neighbourhood Policy was envisaged, through which EU offers “everything, but institutions”.