hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak

EQUALITY AND COMMUNITY: STATE OF NATURE AND SOCIAL CONTRACT IN HOBBES’ AND RAWLS’ THEORY

Ana Matan   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0001-9037-3908 ; Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (211 KB) str. 42-58 preuzimanja: 2.118* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Matan, A. (2004). Jednakost i zajednica: prirodno stanje i društveni ugovor kod Hobbesa i Rawlsa. Politička misao, 41 (4), 42-58. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816
MLA 8th Edition
Matan, Ana. "Jednakost i zajednica: prirodno stanje i društveni ugovor kod Hobbesa i Rawlsa." Politička misao, vol. 41, br. 4, 2004, str. 42-58. https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816. Citirano 22.10.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Matan, Ana. "Jednakost i zajednica: prirodno stanje i društveni ugovor kod Hobbesa i Rawlsa." Politička misao 41, br. 4 (2004): 42-58. https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816
Harvard
Matan, A. (2004). 'Jednakost i zajednica: prirodno stanje i društveni ugovor kod Hobbesa i Rawlsa', Politička misao, 41(4), str. 42-58. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816 (Datum pristupa: 22.10.2019.)
Vancouver
Matan A. Jednakost i zajednica: prirodno stanje i društveni ugovor kod Hobbesa i Rawlsa. Politička misao [Internet]. 2004 [pristupljeno 22.10.2019.];41(4):42-58. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816
IEEE
A. Matan, "Jednakost i zajednica: prirodno stanje i društveni ugovor kod Hobbesa i Rawlsa", Politička misao, vol.41, br. 4, str. 42-58, 2004. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816. [Citirano: 22.10.2019.]

Sažetak
The author compares Hobbes’ state of nature and Rawls’ original position in an attempt to answer the question: How to arrive at a community starting from individualistic premises? The comparison shows a striking similarity between Hobbes’ and Rawls’ initial positions showing itself in the radical equality of the denizens in both ‘states of nature’ and the insistence on the part of both authors to secure recognition of such equality. The essentially similar conditions in the state of nature suggest that the difference between their “social contracts” should lie in the other parts of their theories. The decisive differences lie in Rawls’ assumption that individuals are motivated by a sense of justice (much stronger than in Hobbes’ theory) that enables a choice of principles of justice in Rawls’ state of nature. The agreement on principles is an expression of human sociability, while an agreement on a sovereign is a concession to human unsociability.

Ključne riječi
Hobbes; Rawls; equality; community; state of nature; social contract

Hrčak ID: 21816

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/21816

[hrvatski]

Posjeta: 2.663 *