APA 6th Edition Cepić, D. (2006). Antimodernizam u Heideggera i Jungera. Diskrepancija, 7 (11), 29-42. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/4455
MLA 8th Edition Cepić, Dražen. "Antimodernizam u Heideggera i Jungera." Diskrepancija, vol. 7, br. 11, 2006, str. 29-42. https://hrcak.srce.hr/4455. Citirano 14.06.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition Cepić, Dražen. "Antimodernizam u Heideggera i Jungera." Diskrepancija 7, br. 11 (2006): 29-42. https://hrcak.srce.hr/4455
Harvard Cepić, D. (2006). 'Antimodernizam u Heideggera i Jungera', Diskrepancija, 7(11), str. 29-42. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/4455 (Datum pristupa: 14.06.2021.)
Vancouver Cepić D. Antimodernizam u Heideggera i Jungera. Diskrepancija [Internet]. 2006 [pristupljeno 14.06.2021.];7(11):29-42. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/4455
IEEE D. Cepić, "Antimodernizam u Heideggera i Jungera", Diskrepancija, vol.7, br. 11, str. 29-42, 2006. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/4455. [Citirano: 14.06.2021.]
Sažetak This paper outlines antimodernistic segments of Heidegger and Jünger’s work respectively as well as in their connections. In this analysis Bourdieu’s method of sociological reading of philosophical texts is used. It includes both textual and extra-textual analysis, without giving preference to either. In order to achieve that, one should discard biased reading that would either give autonomy to philosophical texts or reduce that autonomy completely. I tried to
observe the antimodern, conservative elements on the level of the text on the one hand and on the level of daily political situation on the other, and to connect them at the end. Contrary to many theorists who claim that antimodernism is a feature of only certain phases in the work of the above mentioned authors, this paper argues that elements of antimodern thought can be found even in phases where it is not that evident.