hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Ostalo

Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?

Vedran Katavic   ORCID icon orcid.org/0000-0003-2900-1974 ; Croatian Medical Journal, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (120 KB) str. 288-294 preuzimanja: 326* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
Katavic, V. (2010). Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?. Biochemia Medica, 20 (3), 288-294. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289
MLA 8th Edition
Katavic, Vedran. "Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?." Biochemia Medica, vol. 20, br. 3, 2010, str. 288-294. https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289. Citirano 25.06.2019.
Chicago 17th Edition
Katavic, Vedran. "Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?." Biochemia Medica 20, br. 3 (2010): 288-294. https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289
Harvard
Katavic, V. (2010). 'Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?', Biochemia Medica, 20(3), str. 288-294. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289 (Datum pristupa: 25.06.2019.)
Vancouver
Katavic V. Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?. Biochemia Medica [Internet]. 2010 [pristupljeno 25.06.2019.];20(3):288-294. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289
IEEE
V. Katavic, "Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science?", Biochemia Medica, vol.20, br. 3, str. 288-294, 2010. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289. [Citirano: 25.06.2019.]

Sažetak
In this evidence-based opinion piece on responsible conduct of research a short overview of the most prominent recent cases of sanctioned scientific misconduct, developments in the field of responsible conduct of research, definitions of types of scientific misconduct, and questionable research practices is given. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of scientists to publish and perform research is discussed, as well as the perception of fraud, its acceptability and infl uence on science and the scientific (public) record, with a special emphasis on the frequency of sanctioned and discovered fraudulent research. Data on (self)reported willingness to perform misconduct and questionable research practices are analyzed and discussed. An extensive overview on recent publications concerning topics of responsible conduct of research is presented. Finally, some suggestions to what the stakeholders could do are given, as well as easy (self)checks against scientific misconduct.

Ključne riječi
scientific misconduct; plagiarism; publishing; research

Hrčak ID: 59289

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/59289

Posjeta: 543 *