hrcak mascot   Srce   HID

Izvorni znanstveni članak
https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5

In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0

Dubravka KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ ; Zavod za mobilnu protetiku Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Davor Illeš ; Zavod za mobilnu protetiku Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Iva Ž. Alajbeg ; Zavod za mobilnu protetiku Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Maja Žagar ; Zavod za mobilnu protetiku Stomatološkog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski, pdf (441 KB) str. 34-39 preuzimanja: 214* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, D., Illeš, D., Alajbeg, I.Ž. i Žagar, M. (2016). In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50 (1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
MLA 8th Edition
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, Dubravka, et al. "In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 50, br. 1, 2016, str. 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5. Citirano 28.10.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, Dubravka, Davor Illeš, Iva Ž. Alajbeg i Maja Žagar. "In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0." Acta stomatologica Croatica 50, br. 1 (2016): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
Harvard
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, D., et al. (2016). 'In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50(1), str. 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
Vancouver
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ D, Illeš D, Alajbeg IŽ, Žagar M. In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 28.10.2021.];50(1):34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
IEEE
D. KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, D. Illeš, I.Ž. Alajbeg i M. Žagar, "In vivo procjena pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.50, br. 1, str. 34-39, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
Puni tekst: engleski, pdf (441 KB) str. 34-39 preuzimanja: 316* citiraj
APA 6th Edition
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, D., Illeš, D., Alajbeg, I.Ž. i Žagar, M. (2016). In Vivo Evaluations of Inter-Observer Reliability Using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50 (1), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
MLA 8th Edition
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, Dubravka, et al. "In Vivo Evaluations of Inter-Observer Reliability Using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 50, br. 1, 2016, str. 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5. Citirano 28.10.2021.
Chicago 17th Edition
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, Dubravka, Davor Illeš, Iva Ž. Alajbeg i Maja Žagar. "In Vivo Evaluations of Inter-Observer Reliability Using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device." Acta stomatologica Croatica 50, br. 1 (2016): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
Harvard
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, D., et al. (2016). 'In Vivo Evaluations of Inter-Observer Reliability Using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 50(1), str. 34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
Vancouver
KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ D, Illeš D, Alajbeg IŽ, Žagar M. In Vivo Evaluations of Inter-Observer Reliability Using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 28.10.2021.];50(1):34-39. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5
IEEE
D. KNEZOVIĆ ZLATARIĆ, D. Illeš, I.Ž. Alajbeg i M. Žagar, "In Vivo Evaluations of Inter-Observer Reliability Using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 Dental Shade-Matching Device", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.50, br. 1, str. 34-39, 2016. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc50/1/5

Rad u XML formatu

Sažetak
Svrha: Procijeniti pouzdanosti mjerenja ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba. Materijali i metode: Istraživanje je provelo četvero ispitivača dobro uvježbanih za određivanje boje zuba i rukovanje uređajem za određivanje boje zuba. Odredili su boju zuba i CIE L*a*b* vrijednosti na zdravim i intaktnim gornjim desnim središnjim sjekutićima desetero pacijenata. Svaki pojedini ispitivač mjerio je dva puta središnji dio labijalne plohe svakoga pojedinog ispitivanog zuba s pomoću uređaja za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0. Izmjerena je pouzdanost između ispitivača i izračunata su odstupanja u L*a*b* i E vrijednostima. Pouzdanost između ispitivača analizirana je intraklasnim koeficijentima korelacije. Rezultati: Jednosmjerni ANOVA test nije dokazao između četvero ispitivača statistički značajnu razliku u određivanju boje zuba u svim mjerenjima (p > 0,05). Vrijednosti ΔE iznosile su od 3,018 do 5,234. Statistički značajna razlika između ispitivača nije pronađena (p > 0,05), iako su postojale male razlike. Vrijednosti ICC-a između ispitivača bile su visoke i kod svih su se kretale od 0,651 do 0,992 . Zaključak: Rezultati mjerenja pokazali su prihvatljivu pouzdanost mjerenja svih ispitivača uređajem za određivanje boje zuba VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0. Za pravilno određivanje boje zuba, osim digitalne tehnologije, potrebni su i iskusni ispitivači.

Ključne riječi
zubi; boja; optički uređaji

Hrčak ID: 154345

URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/154345

▼ Article Information



Introduction

Providing an esthetically pleasant smile is one of the main concerns in esthetic dentistry and the patients' demands for an improved dental appearance have prompted the industry to continuously raise the bar with regard to materials, techniques and technology.

Recent studies have shown that the tooth color is one of the most important parameters determining the patients' satisfaction with their dental appearance (1-3). On the other hand, clinical assessment and the patient's evaluation of esthetic parameters, including teeth or restorations’ color, may also differ (4). Samorodnitzky-Naveh et al. have proven that laypeople evaluate their teeth darker in comparison to the professionals, and that women assessed tooth shades more accurately than men (5).

In order to avoid the differences arising from both the clinicians and patients’ subjective visual color determination affected by the surrounding illumination, the angle of view of the tooth and the tab, clothing, make-up and the chromatic perception of the dentist such as previous eye exposure and metamerism, fatigue, ageing and emotions, dental shade matching instruments have been brought to the market to reduce or overcome imperfections and inconsistencies of traditional shade matching (6-11).

They encompass different instruments and software. Spectrophotometers are amongst the most accurate, useful and flexible instruments for color matching in dentistry (10, 12). They measure the amount of light energy reflected from an object at 1-25 nm intervals along the visible spectrum (13, 14). Compared with observations by the human eye, or conventional techniques, it was found that spectrophotometers offered a 33% increase in accuracy and a more objective match in 93.3% of cases (8). Some authors suggest that instrumental and visual color matching methods should be used together since they complement each other (15, 16).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-observer reliability of dental shade-matching device (VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0) using an in vivo model. The null hypothesis was that the color assessment tested shows no difference between four observers using the same dental shade-matching device.

Materials and methods

Ten patients with completely healthy and intact maxillary anterior teeth participated in this study. Those with discolorations, stains, evidence of visible tooth wear, composite fillings, veneers of crowns on investigated teeth were excluded. The patients were instructed to place their heads against the headrest of the dental chair and to keep their mouths slightly open during measurement. They were instructed to keep the tongue in a relaxed position away from the maxillary teeth during measurement to prevent false measurements. The central region of the labial surface of each patient's right maxillary central incisor was measured twice by each observer with an interval of 1 hour, and the average value was considered. Patients were provided with water after each sequence to prevent dehydration of the teeth. The following colors were measured: B1, A1, A2, A3, C1 and C3. An intraoral spectrophotometer VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany) was used (Figures 1 and 2). The shade-matching device was operated according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Figure 1 Measured dental color expressed in Vita classical and 3D Master values
ASC_50(1)_34-39-f1
Figure 2 CIE LCh and Lab values of the measured dental color.
ASC_50(1)_34-39-f2

All operators in this study were well trained in color assessment and handling of the dental shade-matching device under standardized test conditions. Before any measurement, the device was calibrated on its own white ceramic block and it was used in ‘tooth single’ mode.

Light test conditions

According to the CIE standard, the daylight illumination conditions (Just Normlicht, Weilheim an der Teck, Germany) were set at 6500 K and 1000 Lux, of 93 foot-candles. Natural daylight was excluded using an optical opaque louver.

Statistical analysis

Color quantification was based on CIE L*a*b* values. Color differences (E) were calculated. Data were imported into statistical program SPSS 19.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). To estimate the in vivo inter-observer reliability in measuring and matching tooth colors, one-way ANOVA (Bonferroni Post Hoc test) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. All tests were performed at an alpha of .05.

Results

The mean L*a*b* values for measurements of 10 right maxillary central incisors measured in an in vivo model by four different observers are shown graphically in Figure 3. One-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences in color measurement of four observers in all the measured values (p>0.05).

Figure 3 Error bars of CIE L*a*b* values measured by four well trained observers
ASC_50(1)_34-39-f3

The mean color differences for the same measurements are shown graphically in Figure 4. Delta E values in this study ranged from 3.018 to 5.234. Although some small differences existed, a statistically significant difference between the observers was not found (p>0.05).

Figure 4 Error bars of delta E values measured by four well trained observers
ASC_50(1)_34-39-f4

ICCs of in vivo model based on L*a*b* measurements of teeth are shown in Table 1. Inter-observer ICCs were very high for all observers (from 0.651 to 0.992) (Table 1).

Table 1 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicating in vivo reliability in measuring tooth color, based on mean of 2 measurements

Observer
1
ICC/p
2
ICC/p
3
ICC/p
4
ICC/p
L*
0.930/<0.001
0.929/<0.001
0.857/<0.001
0.651/<0.001
a*
0.944/<0.001
0.906/<0.001
0.742/<0.001
0.992/<0.001
b*0.966/<0.0010.980/<0.0010.971/<0.0010.971/<0.001

Discussion

In modern dentistry today it is very important to correctly assess the color of the teeth in order to produce the same color effect of the future restoration.

In our previous study we already tested the intra-device repeatability and accuracy of dental shade-matching device (VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0) using both in vitro and in vivo models (17). The results revealed higher L* and lower a* and b* values in the in vivo than the in vitro model, with mean differences of 3.51 and 1.25 delta E units, respectively (p<.001). The device repeatability ICCs for in vivo measurements ranged from 0.858 to 0.971 and for in vitro from 0.992 to 0.994, and the accuracy of the device tested was 93.75% (17).

Before starting color measurements, it is important not only to test the device but to test the potential independent observers to see if two or more of them watching the same events agree on what they observe. In that way, if an adequate level of inter-observer reliability is obtained, each of the observers can observe independently, perhaps at different times and/or in different locations, and their observations can be combined into one data set for analysis.

In the present study, the null hypothesis was that the color assessment tested shows no difference between four observers using the same dental shade-matching device. Although some small differences existed, our results revealed no statistically significant differences in color measurement of four observers in all the measured values (p>0.05) (Figure 3), delta E values ranged from 3.018 to 5.234 (p>0.05) (Figure 4) and observers' ICCs were very high (Table 1). Therefore, the hypothesis was confirmed.

In Lab measurements the values for all four observers were consistent, but delta E values showed wider ranges - exceeded the 50% of perceptibility threshold for a clinical mismatch in the in vivo model (2.6 E units) but still remained below the 50% acceptability level of 5.5 E units (8, 18-21). The highest delta E value was found in the fourth observer (5.234) which almost reached the upper acceptability level and his ICC for L values was the lowest (65%) and therefore we have decided to exclude him from the further measurements (Figure 4, Table 1). Since all four observers in this study were trained and well experienced in color measurements with the tested device and we achieved the standardized conditions and illumination, this finding may be attributed to the tooth variance in surface morphology and the observer's selection of device tip position in the middle third of each tooth.

It has already been reported that there were some differences in the inter-observer reliability dependent on the type of the teeth. Lasserre et al. showed more regular inter-observer measurements on canines than those made on central incisors explaining it with more errors in measurements on the incisors mostly because of their high translucency (22). In the present study we only measured the color of the central incisors and the sample size was small (only 6 shades) and therefore it is difficult to compare the results.

The second explanation for the errors observed in the fourth observer is the device tip position that could have been avoided using the positioning jig. In some studies, the authors mentioned positioning the jig to accurately reposition the measuring unit for each shade measurement due to the smaller diameter of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 (3-5 mm) (8, 23).

Further research should be performed to determine whether a higher number of observers with different levels of experience in color measurement, participating subjects and groups of teeth with different shades would change the repeatability. The positioning jig is highly recommended, too.

Conclusions

The inter-examiner reliability of measurements using VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 shade-matching device was acceptable. The mean color differences ranged from 3.018 to 5.234, which was within the clinical acceptability level. Apart from the digital equipment, a well-trained observer is needed in order to achieve accurate dental color measurement.

References

1 

Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Feb 23;11:6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-11-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21342536

2 

Zlatarić DK, Celebić A. Factors related to patients' general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):86–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18350954

3 

Kristek Zorić E, Žagar M, Knezović Zlatarić D. Influence of Gender on the Patient’s Assessment of Restorations on the Upper Anterior Teeth. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2014;48(1):33–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc48/1/4

4 

Albashaireh ZS, Alhusein AA, Marashdeh MM. Clinical assessments and patient evaluations of the esthetic quality of maxillary anterior restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):65–71. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19260431

5 

Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Grossman Y, Bachner YG, Levin L. Patients' self-perception of tooth shade in relation to professionally objective evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2010 May;41(5):e80–3. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20376367

6 

Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002 Aug;81(8):578–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100815 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12147751

7 

Carsten DL. Successful shade matching--what does it take? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003 Mar;24(3):175–8. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12680347

8 

Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e2–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20621154

9 

Okubo SR, Kanawati A, Richards MW, Childress S. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Dec;80(6):642–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70049-6 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9830067

10 

Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Jun;24(3):222–31. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15227770

11 

Kristiansen J, Sakai M, Da Silva JD, Gil M, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Assessment of a prototype computer colour matching system to reproduce natural tooth colour on ceramic restorations. J Dent. 2011 Dec;39 Suppl 3:e45–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.009 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22100774

12 

Lehmann KM, Devigus A, Igiel C, Wentaschek S, Azar MS, Scheller H. Repeatability of color-measuring devices. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011 Winter;6(4):428–35. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22238725

13 

Khurana R, Tredwin CJ, Weisbloom M, Moles DR. A clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices. Br Dent J. 2007 Dec 22;203(12):675–80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.1108 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18084212

14 

Kielbassa AM, Beheim-Schwarzbach NJ, Neumann K, Nat R, Zantner C. In vitro comparison of visual and computer-aided pre- and post-tooth shade determination using various home bleaching procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Feb;101(2):92–100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60001-9 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19167533

15 

Judeh A, Al-Wahadni A. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection. Quintessence Int. 2009 Oct;40(9):e69–79. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19862392

16 

Fondriest J. Shade matching in restorative dentistry: the science and strategies. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Oct;23(5):467–79. PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14620121

17 

Knezović Zlatarić D, Illeš D, Alajbeg IŽ, Žagar M. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of repeatability and accuracy of VITA Easyshade® Advance 4.0 dental shade-matching device. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015. Forthcoming DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc49/2/4

18 

Meireles SS, Demarco FF, dos Santos Ida S, Dumith Sde C, Bona AD. Validation and reliability of visual assessment with a shade guide for tooth-color classification. Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):121–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-71 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18435184

19 

Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Color Res Appl. 1979;4:83–91.

20 

Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater. 1987 Oct;3(5):246–51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3479360

21 

Ragain JC, Johnston WM. Color acceptance of direct dental restorative materials by human observers. Color Res Appl. 2000;25:278–85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6378(200008)25:4<278::AID-COL8>3.0.CO;2-F

22 

Lasserre JF, Pop-Ciutrila IS, Colosi HA. A comparison between a new visual method of colour matching by intraoral camera and conventional visual and spectrometric methods. J Dent. 2011 Dec;39 Suppl 3:e29–36. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22101123

23 

Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Dunford RG, Wee AG. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Nov;98(5):353–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60119-X PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021823


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.

[engleski]

Posjeta: 927 *