Izvorni znanstveni članak
Curiosity about Curiosity
APA 6th Edition
Šuster, D. (2016). Curiosity about Curiosity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (48), 327-340. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/180180
MLA 8th Edition
Šuster, Danilo. "Curiosity about Curiosity." Croatian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 16, br. 48, 2016, str. 327-340. https://hrcak.srce.hr/180180. Citirano 03.12.2023.
Chicago 17th Edition
Šuster, Danilo. "Curiosity about Curiosity." Croatian Journal of Philosophy 16, br. 48 (2016): 327-340. https://hrcak.srce.hr/180180
Šuster, D. (2016). 'Curiosity about Curiosity', Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 16(48), str. 327-340. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/180180 (Datum pristupa: 03.12.2023.)
Šuster D. Curiosity about Curiosity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 03.12.2023.];16(48):327-340. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/180180
D. Šuster, "Curiosity about Curiosity", Croatian Journal of Philosophy, vol.16, br. 48, str. 327-340, 2016. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/180180. [Citirano: 03.12.2023.]
Ilhan Inan’s (2012) approach to curiosity is based on the following central theses: (i) for every question asked out of curiosity there is a corresponding term (definite description) that is inostensible for the asker (its reference is unknown) and that has the function of uniquely identifying an object; (ii) the satisfaction of curiosity is always in the form of coming to know an object as falling under a concept. This model primarily covers curiosity as our search for empirical objectual knowledge. In my critical reflections, I explore some phenomena of non-objectual curiosity which are left out or at least not sufficiently explored by Inan: curiosity as the search for explanation and understanding, and meta-curiosity—curiosity about the very representations, i.e. how to conceptualize a certain problem, and what definite descriptions to use in the first place.
Posjeta: 625 *