Izvorni znanstveni članak
WHO DID(N'T) "REALIZE" AND/OR "RECOGNIZE" THE TRUE MEANING OF THE "FIGURE OF HOMELAND"? FROM ŠTOOS VIA MATOŠ LEADING UP TO KRLEŽA
Suzana Coha
; Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu
Sažetak
The paper analyses the texts of Pavao Štoos and Antun Gustav Matoš, illustrative both of their writing in the Kajkavian dialect and their representation of patriotic topics. The analysis is based on, on the one hand, the title of Štoos' elegy Kip domovine vu početku leta 1831 (The Figure of Homeland in the Beginning of the Year 1831), reprinted in 1835 in Danica, the central literary paper of the Croatian national revival, and, on the other, literary interpretations of the homeland history and homeland destiny, as well as the interpolation of Kajkavian literature in the Croatian literary canon. The next logical step within this framework of analysis would be the texts of Miroslav Krleža – not only his poem dedicated to Pavao Štoos, who is described as the Croatian poet "who neither realized nor recognized the true meaning of the figure of the homeland", but Krleža's entire oeuvre. Drawing a conclusion from the results of the analysis, as well as the premises that were formed in its course, the end part of the article stresses the fact that Croatian culture has formed the notions of Croatian history and Croatian 'destiny' on literary reflection of reality and on intertextual concatenations, i.e. by obsessive repetition and revalorization of certain topics and motifs. Viewed thus as facts which do not precede language, but are created and formed by it, 'Croatian history' and 'Croatian destiny' are literally indivisible from the old Kajkavian destiny of the "old Kajkavian word" (Krleža).
Ključne riječi
Štoos – Matoš - Krleža; literary interpretations of the homeland history, homeland destiny; the interpolation of Kajkavian literature in the Croatian literary canon; Kajkavian language; 'Croatian destiny' / ‘Kajkavian destiny’
Hrčak ID:
99485
URI
Datum izdavanja:
31.12.2012.
Posjeta: 4.611 *