Synthesis philosophica, Vol. 22 No. 1, 2007.
Izvorni znanstveni članak
Thought and Thing
Urs Richli
Sažetak
I will consider the question what the meaning of the unity of thought and thing is. This unity is introduced by Hegel as the main precondition of the science of logic, when it is understood as the definiens of the logical. I will try to clarify this issue primarily by interpreting chosen fragments in the chapter “Force and the Understanding, Phenomenon and the supra-sensible World” in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Here, Hegel exposes the result of the dialectics of the passage “Perception or Thing and Illusion” as the “unity of the being-for-itself and the beingfor- other”(PhoS, p. 108), and along with this result, he notes: “At first it seems they only pertain to the form of moments; but this being-for-itself and being for-other is also content itself,…” (PhoS, pp. 108 and on). I understand this unity as that between thought and thing. It appears when categories, as Hegel expressed it in logic and Encyclopedia, are seen in themselves. I determine the relationship between the speculative observance and unity of thought and thing as follows:categories are seen in themselves when they neither relate to instances of an extralogical area of use, nor are they considered as the content of meta-level predicates. When, for example, I observe the eidos “difference” in itself, than I think about this as a thing of “difference“, that is, as a differentiation. The unity of thought and thing is a derivation of itself and not the result of an interpretation or outside manipulation. I will try to profile my interpretation by criticizing other approaches (W. Cramer, D. Wandschneider, K. Hartmann).
Ključne riječi
Logic – phenomenology of spirit; thought – thing; form – content; self-relation; meta-level and objectrelated level; objectifying
Hrčak ID:
16501
URI
Datum izdavanja:
6.8.2007.
Posjeta: 2.819 *