DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY
APA 6th Edition
Mandić, I. (2016). DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY. Polemos, XIX (37), 0-0. Preuzeto s https://hrcak.srce.hr/169690
MLA 8th Edition
Mandić, Ivica. "DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY." Polemos, vol. XIX, br. 37, 2016, str. 0-0. https://hrcak.srce.hr/169690. Citirano 28.01.2023.
Chicago 17th Edition
Mandić, Ivica. "DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY." Polemos XIX, br. 37 (2016): 0-0. https://hrcak.srce.hr/169690
Mandić, I. (2016). 'DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY', Polemos, XIX(37), str. 0-0. Preuzeto s: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169690 (Datum pristupa: 28.01.2023.)
Mandić I. DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY. Polemos [Internet]. 2016 [pristupljeno 28.01.2023.];XIX(37). Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169690
I. Mandić, "DEFINING WAR FOR THE 21st CENTURY", Polemos, vol.XIX, br. 37, str. 0-0, 2016. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://hrcak.srce.hr/169690. [Citirano: 28.01.2023.]
Since the end of Cold War discussion on the nature of war rages among security strategy scientists, whether it has changed, and if so, what it implicates. Terms such as “new” and “hybrid” war have already been recorded in thesaurus, suggesting significant, and deep difference between past and contemporary and future wars. Certain analysts even suggest that the term war is obsolete. For these radicals, military and civil establishment have to make effort to exchange tools or transformations in order to adapt to contemporary war. Traditionalist are, opposite to radicals, focused on continuity. They claim that, while the character of war had changed (as it usually appears), its core nature is persistent – is not changed. For traditionalists, strategy is not subject neither to temporary fashion nor fad. This discussion deeply inflicts on strategy, armed forces and leader’s development. Military and civil leaders have to deal with the change of war implications in the light of future security challenges.
Posjeta: 3.634 *