Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

Comparison of two versions of the implicit association test for power motive measurement

Maja Parmač Kovačić ; Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Zvonimir Galić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-0975 ; Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Marija Kušan ; Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 364 Kb

str. 175-189

preuzimanja: 554

citiraj


Sažetak

The aim of the study was to compare the validity of two versions of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) for implicit power motive measurement. In the first IAT version we used natural antonyms “power” and “non-Power” and in the second IAT more equally
desirable categories “dominance” and “cooperation”. The study was conducted on a sample of psychology students (N=73). In addition to the data on two IATs, we collected self-ratings on an explicit measure of power motive, two measures of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and peer-ratings of dominance. Though both IAT versions
showed satisfactory reliability, the IAT “dominance-cooperation” seemed as a more valid measure of implicit power motive. Compared to the IAT “power-nonPower” which had no significant correlations with the other measures used, the IAT “dominance-cooperation” had significant and moderately high correlations with both the
self-ratings and the ratings of dominance and the two measures of intrinsic motivation.

Ključne riječi

Implicit Association Test; power motive; implicit motives; explicit motives

Hrčak ID:

169818

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/169818

Datum izdavanja:

21.12.2015.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 1.615 *