Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.15.4.2

Belief without Representation

Florian Klauser ; University of Ljubljana – Faculty of Education, Ljubljana, Slovenia


Full text: english pdf 266 Kb

page 242-250

downloads: 530

cite


Abstract

In this article, I set off to explore the question “What is belief?” from a first-person perspective. Finding the explanations in analytical philosophy insufficient, I delve into the phenomenological tradition – starting with Edmund Husserl’s concept of the horizon. In doing so, I find that the phenomenological tradition seems to contradict the presupposition of beliefs as representations. Directing my attention to finding an alternative explanation, I present Hubert Dreyfus’ explanation of learning without representations, but show that (by Dreyfus’ own admission) he does not truly take a decisive step away from representationalism. I present the idea of enaction as a proper alternative to representations. Within this new framework, I present the idea of sense-making as a potential direction towards an answer to the question at hand.

Keywords

belief; representation; phenomenology; enaction

Hrčak ID:

191613

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/191613

Publication date:

28.12.2017.

Visits: 1.313 *