Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.21464/sp34208

Robert Simon and the Morality of Strategic Fouling

Miroslav Imbrišević orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7594-7827 ; University of London, Heythrop College, 23 Kensington Square, Kensington, London W8 5HN, UK


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 442 Kb

str. 359-377

preuzimanja: 333

citiraj

Puni tekst: engleski pdf 442 Kb

str. 359-377

preuzimanja: 1.225

citiraj

Puni tekst: francuski pdf 442 Kb

str. 359-377

preuzimanja: 304

citiraj

Puni tekst: njemački pdf 442 Kb

str. 359-377

preuzimanja: 307

citiraj


Sažetak

As sports have become more professional, winning has become more important. This emphasis on results, rather than sporting virtue and winning in style, probably explains the rising incidence of the Strategic Foul. Surprisingly, it has found some apologists among the philosophers of sport. The discussion of the Strategic Foul in the literature has produced subtle distinctions (e.g. Cesar Torres: constitutive skills versus restorative skills) as well as implausible distinctions (e.g. D’Agostino: ‘impermissible’ but ‘acceptable’ behaviour). In this paper I will review Robert Simons' defence of strategic fouling and conclude that his justification is not convincing.

Ključne riječi

Robert Simon; strategic foul; professional sport; sporting virtue

Hrčak ID:

232370

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/232370

Datum izdavanja:

20.12.2019.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski francuski njemački

Posjeta: 4.406 *