Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Pregledni rad

https://doi.org/10.46640/imr.9.17.1

The Rebellion and the inability to communicate Social Consciousness

Dario Terzić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-0407 ; Visoka škola za turizam i menadžment, Konjic, Bosna i Hercegovina


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 417 Kb

str. 2621-2630

preuzimanja: 604

citiraj


Sažetak

Communication implies acceptance, rejection, understanding, disagreement, rebellion. We fight against arbitrariness. Even the first rebel, Prometheus, does not oppose all the gods, especially the nature and everything created. He opposes Zeus’s arbitrariness. „The rebellious man is“, says Albert Camus, „a man who says - no”. Rebellion can be metaphysical (Kain, De Sade), romantics, nihilists, surrealists, Striner, Nietzsche, historical (Spartacus, Bakunin, Marx, Lenin, Mussolini), artistic (Rimbaud, Van Gogh, Zolla, Mayakovsky, Brando). In the 1960s, the character of socially engaged rebels was emphasized. Kellner tells us about the “implosion of identity”, and in doing so implies situations in which identity is constructed using image and style. Hobbes, Locke, Habermas, Thorreau, Bey, Onfray, Passerin d’Entreves, Gibran and many others have contemplated and written about rebellion. The right of rebellion is not always understood as a general human right.

Ključne riječi

communication; rebellion; resistance; disobedience; anarchism

Hrčak ID:

244034

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/244034

Datum izdavanja:

25.9.2020.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 1.876 *