Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.15567/mljekarstvo.2025.0102

Influence of overpressure on microbiological properties and aroma components of semi-hard cheese during ripening in specially designed ripening chambers

Almir Abdurramani ; Shmat “Abdyl Frasheri” Prishtine, Kosovo
Marijana Blažić ; Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Trg J.J. Strossmayer 9, 47000 Karlovac, Croatia *
Dora Herljević ; Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Trg J.J. Strossmayer 9, 47000 Karlovac, Croatia
Elizabeta Zandona ; Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Trg J.J. Strossmayer 9, 47000 Karlovac, Croatia
Mirela Lučan Čolić ; Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Food Technology, Franje Kuhača 18, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
Jurislav Babić ; Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Food Technology, Franje Kuhača 18, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

* Dopisni autor.


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 3.015 Kb

str. 15-27

preuzimanja: 0

citiraj

Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 3.015 Kb

str. 15-27

preuzimanja: 0

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of special ripening conditions on the cheese ripening process and the qualitative characteristics of the final product. The ripening chambers were specially designed to allow precise control of microclimatic conditions, including temperature, humidity, airflow, and most importantly, overpressure. Research methods included conducting microbiological analyses and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis of volatile components on cheese samples aged in a control and overpressure chamber over two months at 10-16 °C and 75-85 % relative humidity. The effect of ripening time (3.59-6.41 weeks, which is approximately 3 weeks and 4 days, and 6 weeks and 3 days, respectively) and overpressure (1.18- 3.31 mbar) was investigated by response surface methodology (RSM). The results showed that overpressure has successfully controlled bacterial and yeast growth during ripening time. Mould levels have shown different trends, with initial growth, followed by a decrease until the end of the ripening period. As for volatile compounds, the presence of 3,5 dihydroxydecanoic acid 1,5 lactone was found to be the most abundant aroma component found in cheese samples. It was concluded that the use of special ripening chambers with overpressure treatment could significantly enhance the microbial stability and aromatic profile of cheese, thereby improving its overall quality.

Ključne riječi

cheese ripening; overpressure; aroma; optimization

Hrčak ID:

323335

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/323335

Datum izdavanja:

29.12.2024.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 0 *




Introduction

Cheese has been a staple in the human diet for thousands of years, and it is known for its diverse flavours and textures. The creation of cheese is a complex and multifaceted process, which involves the careful manipulation of milk, the action of various microorganisms, and a controlled ripening parameters. Cheese ripening, also known as cheese maturation, is the period during which the cheese undergoes biochemical and physical changes that transform it from a fresh, mild product into one with complex and often robust flavours and aromas. The development of these sensory attributes during ripening is the result of several interconnected processes. Central to cheese ripening is the activity of microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, and moulds. These microbes play an integral role in the transformation of cheese, metabolizing various compounds in the cheese matrix and producing a range of flavour compounds. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), for instance, are mainly responsible for acidifying the cheese and contributing to its tangy flavour (McSweeney, 2004). Bacteria, yeasts and moulds can produce volatile organic compounds that impart distinctive aromas to different cheese varieties. Enzymes present in the cheese, or introduced by microbial action, catalyse a series of reactions that break down proteins and fats into simpler compounds (Skeie, 2010). In the case of proteins, this process is known as proteolysis, and it generates peptides and amino acids, some of which contribute to the cheese's salty, savoury, astringent, bitter and umami flavours (Ozturk et al., 2013). Lipolysis, the breakdown of fats, yields free fatty acids that can add creaminess and richness to the cheese (McSweeney, 2007). Furthermore, environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, air flow and oxygen levels play a vital role in shaping the ripening process. These conditions vary widely depending on the cheese type. Adjusting the ripening temperature regime can optimize the course of propionic fermentation and the formation of cheese eyes in Emmental cheese (Bachmann, 2011). Furthermore, the higher the temperature and humidity in the ripening rooms, the greater the growth and development of yeasts (Leclercq-Perlat et al., 2015), which is undesirable in the ripening of hard and semi-hard cheeses such as Emmentaler, Gouda and Tilzit, and desirable in the maturation of smear-ripened cheese, like Limburger or Romadur. All of the above have an influence on cheese quality, and one of the most crucial aspects of its quality is aroma. The diverse range of aromas in cheese is a result of the complex interactions between volatile compounds produced during ripening. The presence of curd’s breakdown products, such as, free amino acids, fatty acids, amines, ketones, lactones, ethanol, etc., is directly related to the cheese making process and the conditions during ripening (Zheng et al., 2021). Some of these compounds are responsible for fruity, nutty, buttery, or earthy aromas, while others contribute to the characteristic pungency and tang found in aged cheeses (Gao et al., 2022). Understanding the development of these aromatic compounds during ripening is of utmost importance to cheese producers and researchers, as it allows for the intentional manipulation of flavour and aroma profiles to meet consumer preferences.

In recent years, the food industry has shown increasing interest in high-pressure processing as a non-thermal method to enhance food safety, extend shelf life, and influence the texture and flavour of various products. The mentioned treatment involves subjecting food products, in this case cheese, to pressures typically ranging from 100 to 600 megapascals (MPa), which is substantially higher than atmospheric pressure. This process can be applied at different stages of cheese production, including the ripening phase. It has been proven that high pressure is effective in inactivating harmful microorganisms such as Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli, Pseudomonas flourescens and other gram-negative microorganisms (Gervilla et al., 2000). This significantly enhances the safety of cheese, particularly for soft and semi-soft varieties. High-pressure processing can also extend the shelf life of cheese by inhibiting the growth of spoilage microorganisms, which can be particularly beneficial for cheese varieties that mature over a long period. Furthermore, some studies have shown that high pressure can enhance the release of volatile compounds, leading to intensified aroma development, and can improve the functional and rheological properties of certain cheese types (O'Reilly et al., 2003; Ozturk et al., 2013). On the other hand, disadvantages of using high-pressure processing can be seen in the following: expensive equipment to acquire and maintain (financial challenges for smaller cheese producers), loss of certain beneficial microflora (e.g. high pressure can deactivate LAB bacteria), and limited application (more suitable for certain cheese types, particularly those with higher moisture content).

While the high-pressure processing is extensively used in the cheese production, including non-thermal pasteurization of milk, during curd formation, and after manufacture for a short period of time and even after the maturation period, as evidenced by Nunez et al. (2020), but it has never been applied in a specially designed ripening chamber during cheese maturation, which is the topic and focus of this scientific paper. Therefore, the objectives of this research were: (a) to determine the optimal conditions for the cheese ripening in an overpressure chamber according to optimal process parameters of cheese maturation verified through GC/MS analysis; (b) to provide microbiological analyses production with the implementation of microbiological controls of yeasts, moulds, Listeria monocitogenes and Salmonella spp.

Materials and methods

Milk collection

Raw whole cow’s milk was obtained from a local dairy farmer in Karlovac (Croatia) in the year 2023, kept overnight and transferred cold (+4 °C) in PVC buckets to the dairy practicum of Karlovac University of Applied Sciences where the cheese production and ripening were carried out.

Cheese production

After receiving the milk, the production of semi-hard cheese began with a Low Temperature Long Time (LTLT) vat pasteurization, where the milk was heated for 25-30 minutes at 63-65 °C. Cheese was produced in a 30 L volume double-stack duplicator with tap water as the heating and cooling medium. After that, 0,00182 % (w/v) (in grams: 0,546) of lyophilized dairy culture (MYStarter CT 330 Series; Streptococcus salivarius ssp. Thermophilus; producer: Maysa Gida, Turkey) and 0,00777 % (w/v) (in grams: 2.33) of microbial rennet (MUCOREN 2000; Rhizomucor miehei; producer: Maysa Gida, Turkey) were added to the pasteurised milk. The cheese curd was cut, drained, moulded and pressed under a pressure of 1-1.5 bar. The final stage of cheese production was brining in a salt concentration of 13% and pH levels 4.5-4.7 for 24 hours.

Cheese ripening

Ripening of cheese was carried out in two specially designed ripening chambers (Fasek d.o.o., Zagreb, Croatia), a control chamber and an overpressure chamber (Figure 1), with temperature, humidity, and airflow control option on a customizable local touch screen display.

image1.png

Figure 1. Process scheme of ripening chambers

The monitoring and regulation of temperature (+0 °C to +30 °C), humidity (40 % to 95 %), airflow velocity (1xØ200 mm - 10W), overpressure, CO2 and O2 concentration was also done through the SCADA system that includes trend logging, graphing and statistical analysis, alarm notifications and email alerts, automated reporting (PDF, CSV), and remote access and control. The ripening chambers are equipped with an audio-visual alarm for set parameters, with adjustable alarm limits for all measured variables. The interior chamber volume for ripening is 530x650x1500 mm (WxDxH), with 5 mobile polypropylene shelves, and a product capacity ranging from 100 to 150 kg.

Control (chamber 1) and overpressure chamber (chamber 2) have the same technical specifications with the exception of additional equipment for overpressure control, ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 mbar) in chamber 2. Cheese samples were held under different pressure treatments (atmospheric pressure of 1.01325 bar in chamber 1, and 1.01443-1.01656 bar in chamber 2) for 3.59 weeks to 6.41 weeks (according to RSM and CCRD design explained in detail in section Experimental design and statistical analysis), as shown in Table 1, with temperatures set lower at 10 °C at the beginning of ripening, increasing to a higher 16 °C in the middle of the process, and then decreasing back to lower levels towards the end, along with relative humidity starting at 75 %, peaking at 85 % mid-ripening, and then dropping back towards 75 % by the end of the ripening period. It is important to note that no care of the cheese was carried out during its ripening, which would include its brushing, washing, coating with various protective agents, etc. The only thing that was carried out was turning the cheeses daily at the beginning of the ripening stage.

Table 1. The uncoded and coded levels of independent variables used in the RSM design

Independent variables Symbols Levels
-1. 414 -1 0 +1 1. 414
Overpressure (mbar)X11.181.502.253.003.31
Time (week)X23.594566.41

Microbiological analyses

Raw milk, pasteurized milk, whey and cheese were analysed for microbiological quality. Before the start of cheese production, 1 L of raw milk was excluded, and during production, 1 L of pasteurized milk and 1 L of whey. Different batches of cheese during ripening were also analysed after week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, both in chamber 1 and 2.

Conducting microbiological analyses on cheese samples

Determining yeasts and moulds according to HRN ISO 21527-1:2012 (Horizontal method for the enumeration of yeasts and moulds - Part 1: Colony count technique in products with water activity greater than 0.95) and HRN ISO 21527-2:2012 (Horizontal method for the enumeration of yeasts and moulds - Part 2: Colony count technique in products with water activity less than or equal to 0.95). The methods include sample preparation, inoculation, and incubation of the test sample. Determining the presence of Salmonella spp. bacteria using the method HR EN ISO 6579-1:2017 (Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration, and serotyping of Salmonella). Determining the presence of Listeria monocytogenes bacteria using the method HR EN ISO 11290-1:2017 (Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria spp.)

Experimental design and statistical analysis

Response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite rotatable design (CCRD) was used for determining optimal conditions (Bas & Boyaci, 2007) for cheese ripening using overpressure ripening chamber. The considered parameters during cheese ripening optimization were as follows: overpressure (1.18-3.31 mbar), and time (3.59-6.41 weeks) (Table 1). Experimental data were fitted with second order response surface model with the following form:

image2.jpeg

(1)

where y is response (the main detected volatile compounds, respectively), β0, βj, βjj, βij are constant coefficients of intercept, linear, quadratic, and interaction terms, respectively; Xi and Xj are coded independent variables [overpressure (X1), and time (X2)]. Ripening temperature and relative humidity were not included in the optimization process because they were constant for all types of cheese in both chambers. The response values were mean of the replicate measurement. Analysis was performed using commercial software Design-Expert® (ver. 12, Stat-Ease Inc., USA). The overall predictive capability of the model is commonly explained by the coefficient of determination (R2). The analysis of variances (ANOVA) was also used to evaluate the quality of the fitted model. The test of statistical difference was based on the total error criteria with a confidence level of 95.0 %. The lack-of-fit is significant at p<0.05 showing the adequacy of the quadratic model selected.

GC-MS analysis of volatile components

Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses were carried out on an Agilent Technologies (Palo Alto, CA, USA) gas chromatograph model 7890B with 5977A mass detector. Operating conditions were: column HP-5MS (5 %-phenyl-methyl polysiloxane, 30 m x 0.25 mm i.d., coating thickness 0.25 µm); Helium as carrier gas: 1 mL min-1; injector temperature: 250 °C; HP-5MS column temperature programmed at 70 °C isothermal for 2 min, and then increased to 200 °C at a rate of 3 °C min-1 and held isothermal for 18 min; 1:50 the split ratio; ionization voltage: 70 eV; ion source temperature: 230 °C; mass scan range: 45-450 mass units. The sample was prepared and analyzed using the HS-SPME procedure (solid phase microextraction) with PAL3 RSI 120 autosampler with SPME fiber DVB/CAR/PDMS (divinyl-benzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane) which was conditioned according to Supelco Co. instructions before extraction. The cheeses (1 g) were placed separately in a glass vial (20 mL) that was hermetically sealed using PTFE/silicone stoppers. The vials were preheted on 60 °C during 5 min and then extraction by HS-SPME was performed (40 min). After the extraction, thermal desorption (7 min) was performed on the GC-MS injector. Injection of SPME fiber in GS-MS inlet indicates start of analysis.

Results and discussion

The high-pressure processing is extensively used in the cheese production, but it has never been applied in specially designed ripening chamber during cheese maturation like in this study. So, it was interesting to compare data obtained with classic cheese ripening with cheese ripening in overpressure chamber in terms of volatile compounds and microbiological analysis.

Furthermore, to optimize the cheese ripening process in a newly designed overpressure chamber, Response surface methodology (RSM) was used. The RSM method was first presented by Box and Wilson (1951) and since then RSM and mathematical modelling have become indispensable tools in optimizing processes. RSM can be defined as a set of statistical and mathematical methods used to model polynomial models and initial data that must display the behaviour of a dataset for the purpose of making statistical predictions. This model is useful in optimizing, designing, developing and improving processes where responses are influenced by multiple variables. Primarily, with the RSM technique not only optimized process parameters were got, but also data on the probability of obtaining a solution and on the sensitivity of the system to changes in given conditions within the experimental range. A great advantage of this method is the interpretation of the results through graphic illustrations (3D graphs), which certainly facilitates the visual experience of the influence of independent variables. In this study, the effect of different independent values of overpressure and cheese ripening time on the volatile compounds (responses) were investigated.

In Table 2 is the screening of the obtained volatile compounds of cheese obtained in overpressure chamber compared to control sample. Ripening chambers have a precise regulation of pressure, humidity, temperature, and time, so all repeated experiments are at exact decided process parameters.

According to that data it can be seen influence of selected overpressure process variables on the most abundant compounds detected using GC/MS (Table 3).

Table 2. Screening of the obtained volatile compounds of cheese obtained in overpressure chamber compared to control sample (RI from the literature used for identifying the compounds)

- - - Area percentages (%)
No Compound RI Control Overpressure
1 3-Methoxyamphetamine0.2194-
2 p-Hydroxynorephedrine0.0429-
3 Ala-gly, trimethylsilyl ester0.13320.1504
4 Ala-.beta.-Ala, trimethylsilyl ester0.2648-
5 2-Methylaminomethyl-1,3-dioxolane0.2597-
6 Benzeneethanamine, 2,5-difluoro-.beta.,3,4-trihydroxy-N-methyl-0.2062-
7 Benzeneethanamine, 2,5-difluoro-.beta.,3,4-trihydroxy-N-methyl-0.0414-
8 Carbonic acid, ethyl-, methyl ester0.1393-
9 Methyl-2,3,5-tri-O-methyl-4-thio.alpha.d-arabinofuranoside0.051-
10 Carbonic acid, ethyl-, methyl ester0.0677-
11 2-Isopropoxyethylamine0.0766-
12 Carbonic acid, ethyl-, methyl ester0.0581-
13 Silanediol, dimethyl-0.0251

0.0696

0.0204

0.0118

14 2-Formylhistamine0.0222
15 2-Formylhistamine0.02020.2166
16 Silane, methyl-0.0102-
17 Hexanoic acid

2.5757

4.9926

2.4037
18 2-Nonanone2.2251-
19 Benzoic acid1.83942.6898
20 Octanoic acid9.78393.2648
21 Benzothiazole0.5285-
22 2-Decenal, (E)-0.472-
23 2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-propyl-0.58270.6147
24 2-Undecanone0.61130.3616
25 2H-1,4-Benzodiazepin-2-one, 7-chloro-1,3-dihydro-5-phenyl-1-(trimethylsilyl)-0.3554-
26 Benzoic acid, 2-mercapto-5-methoxy-0.6441-
27 4-Decenoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z)-0.1123-
28 n-Decanoic acid

23.8087

0.0794

9.2089

0.0562

29 1,3-Cyclohexanediol-0.1497
30 Octanoic acid, ethyl ester0.1513-
31 Tetradecane0.27630.2856
32 Dimethyl phthalate1.88443.8387
33 Cyclopentanone, oxime0.1717-
34 2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-pentyl-12.370813.6195
35 Trisiloxane, 1,1,1,5,5,5-hexamethyl-3,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-1.0182-
36 Dodecanoic acid7.174.0799
37 (S)(+)-Z-13-Methyl-11-pentadecen-1-ol acetate0.7103-
38 Dodecanoic acid0.3555-
39 Heptanoic acid, ethyl ester0.2383-
40 Hexadecane0.9284

1.5512

1.0181

41 2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl-0.4263-
42 Pentadecanal-0.25891.2627
43 1,4-Methanobenzocyclodecene, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,8,9,12,12a-decahydro-0.1286-
44 3,3'-Bicyclopentenyl0.5143-
45 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(2- ctenyl)-, (Z)-0.42490.6194
46 3-Amino-2-phenazinol ditms0.3326-
47 Heptadecanal0.2168-
48 2(3H)-Furanone, 5-heptyldihydro-2.0142.5011
49 2-Tetradecanone0.7926-
50 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-heptyltetrahydro-10.1006-
51 Tetradecanoic acid1.53141.9531
52 Oxacyclotetradecan-2-one, 13-methyl-0.0898-
53 Cyclooctane, 1,2-dimethyl-0.8927-
54 Octadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-, methyl ester0.2545-
55 Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl-0.6048-
56 Eicosane0.27150.2953
57 Oxirane, tetradecyl-0.6880.4843
58 Mercaptosuccinic acid, tris(trimethylsilyl) ester0.2402-
59 Benzoic acid, 4-methyl-, 1-methylpropyl ester0.4083-
60 2-Hexadecene, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-0.70130.9021
61 Benzene, (1-methyldodecyl)-0.1829-
62 2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-octyl-1.8392

13.0818

3.2741

63 n-Hexadecanoic acid0.54992.888
64 Trisiloxane, 1,1,1,5,5,5-hexamethyl-3,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-0.0684-
65 Pentasiloxane, dodecamethyl-0.4061

1.4639

0.397

0.5146

0.3356

1.3327

2.8667

66 Ginsenol0.1982-
67 1-Octadecene0.1754-
68 Formic acid, 1-(4,7-dihydro-2-methyl-7-oxopyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-yl)-, methyl ester0.1637-
69 2-Amino-1-(o-methoxyphenyl) propane-0.0842
70 Benzenemethanol, 2-(2-aminopropoxy)-3-methyl--0.0674
71 Benzeneethanamine, N-methyl--0.0279
72 Benzenethanamine, 2-fluoro-2',4,5-trihydroxy-N-methyl--0.0371
73 Azetidin-2-one 3,3-dimethyl-4-(1-aminoethyl)--0.0396
74 Acetic acid, [(aminocarbonyl)amino]oxo--0.1481
75 Benzeneethanamine, 2-fluoro-.beta.,3-dihydroxy-N-methyl--0.0041
76 Ethanediamide-0.047
77 Propane, 1-methoxy-2-methyl--0.1977
78 2-Butanol, 3-methyl--0.076
79 2-Hexanol-0.0208
80 Benzeneacetaldehyde-0.4687
81 Cyclopentasiloxane, decamethyl--0.6259
82 Acetic acid, [bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy] phosphinyl]-, trimethylsilyl ester-1.5348
83 Dichloroacetic acid, tridecyl ester-0.0778
84 Cetene-0.3698
85 3-Eicosene, (E)--0.1385
86 E-14-Hexadecenal-0.1108
87 Piperazine, 2,6-dimethyl-, cis--0.4289
88 Cyclohept-4-enol-0.1943
89 Bicyclo[4.1.1]oct-2-ene-0.7176
90 Nonadecane, 9-methyl--0.2199
91 Oxalic acid, 3,5-difluorophenyl tetradecyl ester-0.2073
92 Cyclohexadecane-0.3815
93 Benzoic acid, 2,4-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester-0.6768
94 cis-11-Hexadecenal-0.4481
95 2-Pentadecanone-2.0453
96 Ethanol, 2-(tetradecyloxy)--0.1798
97 Tetradecanal-0.2149
98 Z-(13,14-Epoxy)tetradec-11-en-1-ol acetate-0.2681
99 Piperazine, 2,6-dimethyl--0.2059
100 cis-Vaccenic acid-0.3996
101 1-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl--1.2674
102 Ethyl 15-methyl-hexadecanoate-0.4291
103 Dodecane, 2,6,11-trimethyl--0.4124
104 2-Decene, 3-methyl-, (Z)--1.3853
105 m-Toluic acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester-0.8265
106 Acetamide, 2-(adamantan-1-yl)-N-(1-adamantan-1-ylethyl)--0.1077
107 Z-10-Pentadecen-1-ol acetate-0.0785
108 Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(2-methylpropyl)--1.0019
109 2-Hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-cyclohex-2-enone-0.4223
110 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester-0.7636
111 Mandelic acid di(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)--2.0975
112 Acetamide, 2-(adamantan-1-yl)-N-(1-adamantan-1-ylethyl)--0.2726
113 Quinoline-5,8-dione-6-ol, 7-[[(4-cyclohexylbutyl)amino]methyl]--0.1208
114 Heptadecane, 4-methyl--0.1138
115 N-Methyladrenaline, tri-TMS-1.3819
116 cis-13-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester-0.1933
117 1-Pentadecene-0.5671
118 Oleic Acid-0.1104

- not detected

Table 3. The experimental design and data for the response surface analysis (in %-percentage)

Run

Overpressure

(mbar)

Time (week)Hexanoic acidOctanoic acidn-Decanoic acid3,5Dihydroxydecanoic acid 1,5 lactoneDodecanoic acidDelta-Dodecalactone
12.256.417.4713.397.695.772.681.34
22.2552.44.8112.2612.915.8713.97
32.2551.567.437.818.174.99.06
42.2553.6513.6414.7613.625.3613.91
53.3154.514.816.215.710.217.44
61.542.14.14.44.63.35.31
7367.98.16.97.25.68.4
82.2552.6410.4913.2615.618.3613.95
92.253.5911.2125.9914.038.321.271.85
101.562.54.124.35.14.55.2
111.1952.43.85.16.45.117.7
122.2551.378.1213.3917.654.7315.21
13349.122.118.420.313.318.1

From the data obtained in Table 3 it can be seen that the concentration of hexanoic acid is relatively low compared to other developed compounds ranging from 1.56 to 11.21 %. Hexanoic acid, also known as caproic acid, is a saturated fatty acid naturally found in various foods and is known for its pungent, acidy and goat-like smell. In moderate amounts, it can contribute to the aroma profile of some cheese varieties giving it a sweaty, cheesy aroma (Fan and Qian, 2006). Octanoic (caprylic) acid can also contribute to the aroma of some cheese varieties. This saturated fatty acid has a slightly fruity and sweet but also rancid, musty, wax-like and goat-like notes. It is most commonly found in coconut oil and certain dairy products (Altinoz et al., 2020). The highest concentrations of caprylic acid are recorded by cheeses in experiment at run 9 and run 13, which ripened under 2.25 and 3 mbar for 3.59 and 4 weeks, respectively. The concentrations of octanoic acid vary widely across the samples, ranging from as low as 3.80 to as high as 25.99 %. In addition to giving cheese aroma, caprylic acid is also recognized and used as an antimicrobial agent (Nair et al., 2005). Another saturated fatty acid with slightly rancid odour is n-decanoic (capric) acid. Capric acid is typically not a desirable component of cheese aroma. Its sour, rancid, and animal-flavour attributes are generally considered unpleasant and should be minimized during cheese production (Güler, 2005). The lowest concentrations were observed under the lowest overpressure treatment 1.19 and 1.50 mbar. Caproic, caprylic, and capric acid have been identified in different cheese types such as aged Cheddar, Grana Padano, and predominantly in goat cheese, and can be desirable when it imparts a characteristic "goaty" or tangy aroma (Tian et al., 2020). The highest concentration of the mentioned compounds was proven under the lowest cheese ripening time and overpressure conditions of 2.25 mbar. However, excessive levels can lead to an unpleasant odour, so its presence should be carefully controlled. During cheese production, especially in the early stages of fermentation, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and other microorganisms present in the milk break down triglycerides as a result of their metabolic activity, various fatty acids are released, including hexanoic acid, octanoic acid and decanoic acid. Studies show that the presence of 3,5 dihydroxydecanoic acid 1,5 lactone can be influenced by the metabolic activity of various types of fungus (Laili et al., 2017; Mentle, 1987; Vesonder et al., 1972). This cyclic ester was found to be the most abundant aroma component found in cheese samples. Lactones are known for imparting a rich and fatty character to the aroma profile of cheeses which would make them a desirable compound in cheese, as it can contribute to a creamy and slightly sweet aroma. Furthermore, dodecanoic acid, or lauric acid, is a saturated fatty acid with a twelve-carbon chain. It has soapy and waxy notes that can lead to off-flavours, and is not typically a desirable aroma compound in cheese and should be kept at low levels (Güler, 2005). Consequently, lower concentrations of lauric acid (1.27-13.30 %) were found in cheese samples compared to other aroma components. Delta-dodecalactone can be a desirable component in cheese aroma, as it imparts sweet and creamy notes. It is often associated with a pleasant buttery, caramel-like aroma, and its presence can enhance the sensory experience of certain cheese varieties. Higher concentrations were found at higher overpressure treatments (2.25-3.31 mbar). Cheese samples with the same overpressure and time may have significantly different aroma components concentrations. It seems that neither overpressure (measured in mbar) nor time duration (in weeks) alone can fully explain the variation in aroma components concentration.

The effect of the linear, quadratic or interaction coefficients on the response was tested for significance by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Regression coefficients of intercept, linear, quadratic, and interaction terms of the model were calculated using least square method. The degree of significance of each factor is represented by its p-value. Table 4 shows the corresponding p-values for selected response variables for each obtained coefficients and interactions. From Table 4 it can be noticed that the overpressure exhibited the most statistically significant influence (p<0.05) on all six investigated responses. However, time exhibited statistically significant influence only on the amount of octanoic acid and n-decanoic acid. The interaction between overpressure and time show significant influence only on the amount of octanoic acid and n-decanoic acid.

Table 4. Regression coefficient of polynomial function of all response surfaces

Term Coefficients Standard error F-value p-value*
Hexanoic acid
Intercept2.320.7363
X 1 1.920.582110.890.0131
X 2 -0.76110.58211.710.2323
X 1 X 2 -0.40000.82320.23610.6419
X 1 2 0.31420.62420.25350.6301
X 2 2 3.260.624227.260.0012
Octanoic acid
Intercept8.901.68
X 1 4.691.3312.410.0123
X 2 -3.971.338.910.0097
X 1 X 2 -3.511.883.460.0204
X 1 2 -1.021.430.51160.1051
X 2 2 4.171.438.540.4976
n-decanoic acid
Intercept12.301.06
X 1 4.040.839523.130.0019
X 2 -2.570.83959.380.0183
X 1 X 2 -2.851.195.760.0474
X 1 2 -1.390.90022.370.1673
X 2 2 -1.280.90022.030.1975
3,5 dihydroxydecanoic acid 1,5 lactone
Intercept13.591.35
X 1 3.871.0613.230.0083
X 2 -2.031.063.630.0985
X 1 X 2 -3.401.505.110.0583
X 1 2 -1.211.141.120.3247
X 2 2 -3.211.147.920.0260
Dodecanoic acid
Intercept5.840.8708
X 1 2.290.688411.040.0127
X 2 -0.56320.68840.66940.4402
X 1 X 2 -2.220.97355.220.0562
X 1 2 1.370.73823.450.1058
X 2 2 -1.470.73823.960.0868
Delta-dodecalactone
Intercept13.221.11
X 1 3.720.878317.950.0039
X 2 -1.320.87832.250.1776
X 1 X 2 -2.401.243.730.0949
X 1 2 0.21750.94180.05330.8240
X 2 2 -5.270.941831.310.0008

X1 - overpressure; X2 - time; * p<0.01 highly significant; 0.01≤p< 0.05 significant; p≥0.05 not significant.

Table 5. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the modelled responses

Source Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean square F-value p-value
Hexanoic acid
The recovery
Model108.79521.768.030.0082
Residual18.9772.71
Lack of fit15.6235.216.200.0551
Pure error3.3640.8394
Total127.7612
R2 = 0.8515
Octanoic acid
The recovery
Model490.18598.046.910.0123
Residual99.32714.19
Lack of fit54.82318.271.640.3143
Pure error44.49411.12
Total589.5012
R2 = 0.8315
n-decanoic acid
The recovery
Model237.71547.548.430.0071
Residual39.4675.64
Lack of fit11.1433.710.52440.6886
Pure error28.3247.08
Total277.1712
R2 = 0.8576
3,5 dihydroxydecanoic acid 1,5 lactone
The recovery
Model274.93554.996.080.0174
Residual63.3479.05
Lack of fit12.9434.310.34230.7975
Pure error50.40412.60
Total338.2712
R2 = 0.8127
Dodecanoic acid
The recovery
Model96.49519.305.090.0275
Residual26.5473.79
Lack of fit17.8435.952.740.1778
Pure error8.7042.17
Total123.0212
R2 = 0.7843
Delta-dodecalactone
The recovery
Model346.59569.3211.230.0031
Residual43.1976.17
Lack of fit20.3636.791.190.4199
Pure error22.8445.71
Total389.7912
R2 = 0.8892

Analysis of variance (Table 5) shows that the regression models for all investigated responses were statistically relevant with a significance level ranging from p<= 0.0031 to p=0.0275, and the models had no significant lack of fit (p>0.05). The fitted model represents the experimental data well with high correlation coefficients, R2, varying from 0.7843 to 0.8892, depending on investigated responses.

The three-dimensional plots used to express the investigated responses (y) as a function of independent variables (in terms of coded values) are shown in Figure 2. According to the Figure 2 it can be seen that by increasing of overpressure the amount of all six responses (hexanoic acid, 3,5 dihydroxydecanoic acid 1,5 lactone, dodecanoic acid, delta-dodecalactoneoctanoic acid, and n-decanoic acid) increase significantly. Time od cheese ripening shows different influence on observed responses. In general, the trend of aroma components formation was increasing with ripening time. The concentration of hexanoic acid and octanoic acid records a slight decrease in values after the 4th week of ripening, which increases as time progresses. While the values of dodecanoic acid, delta-dodecalactoneoctanoic acid, and n-decanoic acid show a positive trend. The concentration of the mentioned aroma components increases during ripening, up to about 5.5 weeks of ripening, and towards the sixth week, the concentration decreases slightly.

image3.jpeg

Figure 2. Three-dimensional plots for obtained responses as a function of time of cheese ripening and overpressure

Microbiological analyses of cheese samples showed the absence of pathogenic and unwanted microorganisms, the total number of microorganisms was within the limits. By reviewing Table 6 and Table 7, it can be observed that the number of yeasts and moulds in the control and overpressure chamber was mostly maintained at a low level (<2.00 log CFU/g) throughout all ripening times. This suggests that the cheese ripening process under controlled conditions successfully controlled yeast growth. On the other hand, mould levels have shown different trends. Overpressure levels of 2.25 and 3 mbar increased mould numbers over ripening time from weeks 1-3. After week 3, the number of moulds in the cheese sample began to decrease until the end of the ripening period suggesting that the initial growth phase of moulds was followed by a decline, possibly due to the prolonged period of pressure treatment, or factors such as competition for nutrients or changes in environmental conditions (pH changes, moisture content, oxygen levels, etc.) that were altered by the pressure treatment. It is evident that the difference in the level of pressure used affected the growth dynamics of yeasts and moulds.

Table 6. Microbiological quality of cheese samples obtained in control chamber compared to the cheese samples obtained in an overpressure chamber with a 2.25 mbar

Number of yeasts
Ripening time (weeks) Control chamber (log CFU/g) Overpressure (log CFU/g)
1 <2.00<2.00
2 <2.003.00
3 <2.002.48
4 >4.18<2.00
5 4.08<2.00
6 //
7 2.782.40
Number of moulds
Ripening time (weeks) Control chamber (log CFU/g) Overpressure (log CFU/g)
1 <2.00<2.00
2 3.463.38
3 >4.183.84
4 >4.182.65
5 3.452.18
6 //
7 3.533.15

Table 7. Microbiological quality of cheese samples obtained in control chamber compared to the cheese samples obtained in an overpressure chamber with a 3 mbar

Number of yeasts
Ripening time (weeks) Control chamber (log CFU/g) Overpressure (log CFU/g)
1 <2.00<2.00
2 //
3 <2.00<2.00
4 <2.00<2.00
5 <2.00<2.00
6 <2.00<2.00
Number of moulds
Ripening time (weeks) Control chamber (log CFU/g) Overpressure (log CFU/g)
1 >4.182.40
2 //
3 3.953.88
4 3.913.34
5 3.463.80
6 2.48<2.00

Conclusion

As known, free fatty acids are important, or even predominant, components of cheese flavour. The concentration of aroma compounds in cheese during ripening is the result of a complex interplay between pressure and time, as well as other cheese-specific ripening parameters. While higher pressures may lead to higher concentrations of certain compounds, and longer ripening times can influence the concentration of some aroma compounds, the relationship is not consistent for all compounds. The optimal conditions for the cheese ripening in an overpressure chamber according to GC/MS analysis, and best cheese microbiological quality, would include shorter cheese ripening time and overpressure conditions of 3.00 mbar. However, the data reveals that the concentration of aroma compounds can vary significantly from one cheese sample to another, even under the exact same pressure and time conditions. This suggests that cheese ripening is influenced by more factors, including the specific microbial and enzymatic activities involved in the ripening process, complex biochemical processes, cheese production process, cheese care, position in the ripening chamber, and more. Based on the analysed data, it can be concluded that the cheese ripening process significantly impacts the presence of yeast and mould in cheese samples. Controlled ripening conditions appear effective in suppressing yeast growth, while variations in mould presence depend on different ripening conditions and pressure levels. Further studies may be needed to better understand the mechanisms behind these changes and to optimize cheese ripening conditions for microbiological quality control.

References

1 

Altinoz, M.A., Ozpinar, A., Seyfried, T.N. 2020Caprylic (octanoic) acid as a potential fatty acid chemotherapeutic for glioblastoma. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. 159:102142https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2020.102142

2 

Bachmann, H.-P. 2011Cheese - Swiss-type Cheeses.In: Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. J.W. Fuquay (Ed.), , editor. Elsevier, MS, USA,: p. 712–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00085-6

3 

Bas, D., Boyaci, I.H. 2007Modelling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering. 78(3):836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024

4 

Box, G.E.P., Wilson, K.B. 1951On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 13(1):1–45

5 

Fan, W., Qian, M.C. 2006Characterization of aroma compounds of Chinese "Wuliangye" and "Jiannanchun" liquors by aroma extract dilution analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54(7):2695–2704. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf052635t

6 

Gervilla, R., Ferragut, V., Guamis, B. 2000High pressure inactivation of microorganisms inoculated into ovine milk of different fat contents. Journal of Dairy Science. 83(4):674–682. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74928-9

7 

Güler, Z. 2005Quantification of free fatty acids and flavor characteristics of Kasar cheeses. Journal of Food Lipids. 12(3):209–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1745-4522.2005.00018.X

8 

Havranek, J., Kalit, S., Antunac, N., Samaržija, D. 2014Sirarstvo.Hrvatska mljekarska udruga. Zagreb.:

9 

Laili, I., Gunarso, S., Wathan, N., Sugijanto, N.E., Indrayanto, G 2017Identification of Massoia lactone and its hydroxy-derivative from Kabatiella caulivora, an endophyte of the terrestrial plant Alyxia reinwardtii. Makara Journal of Science. 21(4):182–186. https://doi.org/ 10.7454/mss.v21i4.8840

10 

Leclercq-Perlat, M.N., Sicard, M., Perrot, N., Trelea, I.-C., Picque, D., Corrieu, G. 2015Temperature and relative humidity influence the ripening descriptors of Camembert-type cheeses throughout ripening. Journal of Dairy Science. 98(2):1325–1335. https://doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.2014-8916

11 

Mantle, P.G. 1987Secondary Metabolites of Penicillium and Acremonium. In: Penicillium and Acremonium. Biotechnology Handbooks. 1: J.F. Peberdy (Ed.), , editor. Springer,. (Boston, MA.). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4899-1986-1_6

12 

McSweeney, P.L.H. 2004Biochemistry of cheese ripening. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 5723:127–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2004.00147.x

13 

McSweeney, P.L.H. 2007Cheese manufacture and ripening and their influence on cheese flavour. In: Improving the flavour of cheese. B.C. Weimer (Ed.), , editor. Woodhead Publishing Limited,; Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge, England,: p. 1–20

14 

Nair, M.K.M., Joy. J., Vasudevan, P., Hinckley, L., Hoagland, T.A., Venkitanarayanan, K.S. 2005Antibacterial effect of caprylic acid and monocaprylin on major bacterial mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Science. 88(10):3488–3495. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73033-2

15 

Nuñez, M., Calzada, J., del Olmo, A. 2020High pressure processing of cheese: lights, shadows and prospects. International Dairy Journal. 100:104558https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.104558

16 

O'Reilly, C.E., Kelly, A.L., Oliveira, J.C., Murphy, P. M., Auty, M.A.E, Beresford, T.P. 2003Effect of varying high-pressure treatment conditions on acceleration of ripening of cheddar cheese. Innovative Food Science Emerging Technology. 4(3):0–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1466-8564(03)00037-7

17 

Ozturk, M., Govindasamy-Lucey, S., Jaeggi, J. J., Johnson, M.E., Lucey, J.A. 2013The influence of high hydrostatic pressure on regular, reduced, low and no salt added Cheddar cheese. International Dairy Journal. 33:175–183

18 

Skeie, S. 2010Milk quality requirements for cheesemaking.In: Improving the Safety and Quality of Milk. M.W. Griffiths (Ed.), , editor. Woodhead Publishing.; p. 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845699437.3.432

19 

Sousa, M.J, Ardö, Y., McSweeney, P.L.H. 2001Advances in the study of proteolysis during cheese ripening. International Dairy Journal. 1147:0–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-6946(01)00062-0

20 

Tian, H., Sun, X., Yu, H., Ai, L., Chen, C. 2020Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Yunnan goat milk cake using a sensory-directed flavor analysis. Journal of Food Science. 85:3981–3997. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15490

21 

Tian, H., Xu, X., Chen, C., Yu, H. 2019Flavoromics approach to identifying the key aroma compounds in traditional Chinese milk fan. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(11):9639–9650. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16796

22 

Vesonder, R.F., Stodola, F.H., Rohwedder, W.K. 1972Formation of the δ-lactone of 3,5-dihydroxydecanoic acid by the fungus Cephalosporium recifei. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry. 50(4):363–365. https://doi.org/10.1139/o72-048

23 

Zheng, X., Shi, X., Wang, B. 2021A review on the general cheese processing technology, flavor biochemical pathways and the influence of yeasts in cheese. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12:703284https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.703284

Acknowledgements

This paper was produced as part of the "Modification of cheese ripening process and development of whey based products - SIRENA" project co-financed by the European Union from the European Structural and Investment Funds in the financial period 2014–2020 and the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Cohesion. Contract No: KK.01.1.1.04.0096.

This paper was produced as part of the "Atrium of Knowledge" project co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund and the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Cohesion 2014-2020. Contract No:KK.01.1.1.02.0005.

This paper was produced as part of the "The influence of the application of plant extracts on the properties and ripening of semi-hard cheese - SIROFONIJA", financed with the funds of the National Recovery and Resilience plan 2021 - 2026.


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.