Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.31141/zrpfs.2025.62.155.37

Interpreting Interpretative Errors

Natalia Scavuzzo orcid.org/0000-0002-8009-7468 ; Università di Bologna

Sažetak

This article examines the attribution of interpretative errors in judicial decision-making, a recurring yet under-theorised element of legal practice. It highlights how ideologies of legal interpretation and legal decision-making shape the criteria for evaluating interpretative correctness and critiques traditional dichotomies between axiological and epistemic errors. Proposing an integrated approach that merges decision-making and cognition, the study underscores the ideological commitments inherent in interpretative activities and their implications for the principle of legality and judicial accountability. In this light, it explores the dual function of error ascriptions: maintaining interpretative normalcy and driving change within judicial practices.

Ključne riječi

legal interpretation; ideology; legality; epistemic error; axiological error

Hrčak ID:

331240

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/331240

Datum izdavanja:

31.3.2025.

Posjeta: 254 *