Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Sažetak sa skupa

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2025.294

Safer pacemaker replacements: rapid translation of evidence into practice

Ana-Maria Goronić orcid id orcid.org/0009-0005-7767-7575 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Mateja Lovrić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-6521 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marina Žanić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5123-8586 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marina Budetić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1165-7097 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Nikolina Slamek orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-8793 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Mirela Adamović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-7436 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Marija Grlić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4288-9659 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Mario Tomašević orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-0931-9272 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivan Horvat orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-7341 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivica Benko orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1878-0880 ; Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 139 Kb

str. 294-294

preuzimanja: 111

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Ključne riječi

pacemaker replacement; infection prevention; iodinated adhesive drape; patient safety; nursing competencies

Hrčak ID:

337500

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/337500

Datum izdavanja:

5.11.2025.

Posjeta: 311 *



Introduction: Generator replacement represents more than 25% of all cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures and carries a substantially increased risk of infection compared with de novo implantations (up to 2–4 times higher) (1). A randomized clinical trial in JAMA Cardiology including 427 patients demonstrated that the use of iodinated adhesive drapes reduced bacterial contamination from 9.9% to 2.9%, corresponding to a relative risk reduction of nearly 70% (2). This finding emphasizes a simple, evidence-based modification with direct implications for patient safety.

Results: Immediately after publication, our center introduced iodinated adhesive drapes in all pacemaker and defibrillator replacements. The adoption was nurse-led, integrated into the existing workflow without prolonging patient preparation, and involved negligible additional cost. In the first two months after introduction, adherence was 100%, with seamless incorporation into sterile field preparation and no negative impact on procedural logistics. Nursing staff ensured protocol standardization, education, and real-time monitoring of compliance.

Conclusion: The introduction of iodinated adhesive drapes for CIED replacements demonstrates how rapid translation of evidence into practice can significantly improve patient safety. Beyond infection prevention, this change highlights the importance of developing advanced nursing competencies, accepting new technologies, and continuously enhancing standards of care.

LITERATURE

1 

Toriello F, Saviano M, Faggiano A, Gentile D, Provenzale G, Pollina AV, et al. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection Assessment, Diagnosis and Management: A Review of the Literature. J Clin Med. 2022 October 6;11(19):5898. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195898 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36233765

2 

Aydin A, Golian M, Klein A, Redpath C, Davis DR, Ramirez FD, et al. Iodinated Adhesive Drapes for Repeat Cardiac Implantable Device Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 October 1;10(10):1016–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2835 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40864462


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.