Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.15644/asc60/1/4

Quality of Recovery after Intraoral Surgery: Total Intravenous Anaesthesia versus Sevoflurane: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Ivan Šitum ; Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, University Hospital Centre Zagreb; *
Slobodan Mihaljević ; Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Igor Blivajs ; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia, Croatia
Martina Perić Šitum ; Department of Neurology, Dubrava University Hospital, Croatia
Pjetra Karlović ; University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Dubrava University Hospital
Željko Verzak ; University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Dental Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Zoran Karlović ; University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia; Department of Dental Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb

* Corresponding author.


Full text: english pdf 1.227 Kb

page 58-70

downloads: 212

cite

Full text: croatian pdf 1.227 Kb

page 58-70

downloads: 66

cite


Abstract

Objectives: To compare the quality of recovery between total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and balanced inhalational anaesthesia with sevoflurane in patients undergoing intraoral surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial on 50 patients (25 per group) who underwent intraoral surgical procedures longer than 30 minutes. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery measured by the QoR-40 questionnaire at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included bite force, hand grip strength, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative shivering. Results: QoR-40 scores did not differ between groups at any time point (differences from -0.04 to 1.2 points, all p>0.05). Bite force and hand grip strength did not differ between groups. However, TIVA
eliminated PONV (0% vs 28%, p=0.010, NNT=4) and shivering (0% vs 36%, p=0.002, NNT=3). Conclusion: TIVA and sevoflurane result in a similar quality of recovery after intraoral procedures. However, TIVA eliminates PONV and shivering, which represents a clinically significant benefit for patients undergoing intraoral surgery.

Keywords

Oral Surgery; Intravenous Anesthesia; Inhalation Anesthesia; Propofol; Sevoflurane; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia; intravenous; sevoflurane; oral surgical procedures; postoperative nausea and vomiting; recovery of function

Hrčak ID:

345389

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/345389

Publication date:

13.3.2026.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 577 *