Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Stručni rad

From Our Libraries:
Danko Škare (ed.)
Metrics of Scientific Journalism - Truths, Myths and Misconceptions

J. Stojanovski orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-522X ; Sveučilište u Zadru, Zadar, Hrvatska; Institut Ruđer Bošković, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 1.121 Kb

str. 179-186

preuzimanja: 1.182

citiraj


Sažetak

The evolution of the digital age has led to the development of so-called abstracting/indexing printed publications in online databases. A short survey of the four most popular databases in Croatia has been done, as Current Contents, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, with short history, coverage (included Croatian titles), features and possibilities of citation analysis. We discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and the importance of the efficient usage and appropriate interpretation of the data. The journal impact factor and other bibliometric measures are frequently misused to estimate the influence of individual papers and authors. Explaining potential benefits and limitations of bibliometric indicators, this article may help policymakers, librarians, administrators, and individual researchers to use the data provided by different databases more carefully and wisely in the evaluation of research.

Ključne riječi

metrics: scientific journalism; citation analysis; online databases; impact factor

Hrčak ID:

50497

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/50497

Datum izdavanja:

6.4.2010.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 2.547 *