Original scientific paper

The Principle of Autonomy and the Ethics of Advance Directives

Stavroula Tsinorema ; University of Crete, Philosophy and Social Studies Department, Rethymno Campus, Crete, Greece

Abstract

Advance directives are conceptualised as a means of increasing “patient autonomy”, as they enforce individuals’ power of choice over a post-competence dying process. There is, however, controversy over their moral force. Rebecca Dresser and John Robertson offer a conceptual argument grounded in epistemological considerations concerning personhood which challenges their authority. Roland Dworkin defends forcefully “precedent autonomy” in planning post-competence medical care. This paper examines the above opposing theses and assesses their main arguments. Limitations are detected in both. Regarding the former, its conceptualisation of the notion of personhood is found to be problematic, and regarding the latter, its conception of individual autonomy is found to be too narrow. An alternative route is explored by reconstructing Kant’s conception of moral autonomy. It provides a framework for moral reasoning, from which certain contemporary understandings of autonomy as a right, as a reflective capacity of the individual, as responsibility and integrity can be properly assessed and justified. Normative conclusions follow regarding the extension of personal autonomy in advance medical choice.

Keywords

advance directives; agency; autonomy; Rebecca Dresser; Ronald Dworkin; Immanuel Kant; personhood; respect

Hrčak ID:

162954

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/162954

Publication date:

27.8.2015.

Article data in other languages: german french croatian

Visits: 2.917 *